Page 28 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 19
P. 28

Introduc�on: Who is Bernard of Clairvaux?              “has to love itself first” (30). Only then can one
        Who is Bernard of Clairvaux and why do we              gradually ascend to the love of God and even-
        care about what he has to say? In my case, I           tually come to love “oneself only for God’s
        care because I was educated by the Cistercian          sake” (34). Seen in the light of the last stage,
        fathers, contemporary members of his mona-             the narcissism of the first is revealed as the se-
        s�c community. Their personal example of fide-         minal presence in the soul of the Kingdom of
        lity to Christ, holiness, and above all charity led    God. Across all stages, self-love within the li-
        me to Bernard’s wri�ngs. My personal fondness          mits of the moral law is not an act of mere for-
        for Bernard aside, let me suggest that we              mal or external obedience but rather a gradual
        should care about Bernard’s work not only be-          process of the believer becoming a co-worker
        cause it is true but because he prac�ced what          with Christ in his or her own salva�on, of con-
        he preached; he loved sacrificially.                   forming the self to Christ and taking every
                                                               thought cap�ve.
        Building on our Lord’s teaching of the two grea-
        test commandments (Ma�hew 22:37-40; Mark               Given the limits of human nature and our sinful
        12:29-31; Luke 10:27) the monk, preacher, spi-         condi�on, this last stage of love is something
        ritual author, and saint Bernard of Clairvaux          we only glimpse in this life; it is “something
        (1090-1153), teaches that the love of God,             [we] may [only] hope to possess… or rather to
        neighbor, and self are interconnected. He tou-         be possessed by” in heaven (36). Rather than
        ches on this in sermons and le�ers and at              seeing this as nega�ve, Bernard sees it as the
        length in his trea�se On Loving God (Bernard of        source of compassion for self and others. In ad-
        Clairvaux, 2016). For Bernard, love is not tran-       di�on, this unfulfilled longing is a reminder of
        sac�onal; it is “not a contract” but “an affec�on      the joy that awaits us in the Kingdom of God
        of the soul.” It is not rooted in “mere agree-         and so both fidelity and pa�ence. Finally, desire
        ment” but arises spontaneously in response to          is a source of hope.
        the beloved. Love’s true reward is not any ex-
        ternal benefit but the beloved (Bernard of             Sacrificial Love
        Clairvaux, 2016, 26).                                  “God Himself,” writes Bernard, “is the mo�ve of
                                                               our love for Him.” As for “the measure of love”
        A keen psychologist of the spiritual life, Bernard     we owe God the answer is “clear enough” to
        iden�fies four stages or “degrees” in our forma-       those who have studied the Scriptures; we are
        �on in love:                                           to love Him “without measure.” Because
        1. I love myself for the sake of myself.               though he is the abbot of a monastery made up
        2. I love God out of a recogni�on of my need for       of both the “learned and the unlearned” he re-
        Him.                                                   alizes he must remember the la�er even if he
        3. I love God in gra�tude for His many gi�s to         has already “said enough for the former.” And
        me.                                                    so the love of neighbor requires that he “unfold
        4. Finally, I come to love myself because God          [his] meaning, and perhaps add somewhat to
        first loved me.                                        it” for the benefit of all (p. 9).


        There is a self-referen�al aspect to all four de-      This is not merely a moral or ins�tu�onal obli-
        grees of love. The frank narcissism of the first       ga�on for Bernard. Faithful to the example of
        stage gives way in �me to the humility of the          Christ Who “gave Himself to us in spite of our
        second, the eucharis�c character of the third,         unworthiness, and, being God, what could He
        and culminates in an act of obedience that is a        give us of greater worth than Himself” his cate-
        foretaste of the Kingdom of Heaven. This need          chesis on love is also his own, personal act of
        not disturb us or compel us to doubt the since-        self-offering. His trea�se is a sacrifice of his
        rity of especially the opening movement as the         own interiority for the sake of his spiritual sons
        soul comes to understand the eschatological            and, as it happens, for us as well. Such sacrifici-
        nature of love. In order to transcend the cons-        al service for others is a central theme of Be-
        traints of a “nature… so� and weak,” the soul          nard’s life. Though a nobleman, he renounces


                                                           28
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33