Page 31 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 19
P. 31

and unlike us, God is wholly present in all His        How does this unfold?
        ac�ons. This is why for Bernard the next two           Loving God for my own sake, I can’t but “feel
        degrees of love are discussed together. To come        the limits” of my own life. I want to succeed not
        to love God because of my great need for Him           in loving God but in my myriad plans and pro-
        is to come to love Him for what He does for me         jects. To do so I at least intui�vely “know … [I]
        as well as Who He has revealed Himself to be           cannot do [so] without the help of God.”
        not only in crea�on and redemp�on. And Who
        God is as Creator and Redeemer is also Who He          But, let a train of disasters befall and oblige
        is for me (pro me).                                    [me] perpetually to have recourse to God … [to]
                                                               get the aid [I need] … [and only a heart] of brass
        Reflec�ng on my need for Him and the mani-             or marble [would] not at last be touched by the
        fold expressions of His grace, I come--or should       goodness [of God and] … begin to love Him for
        come anyway--to an enduring sense of gra�tu-           Himself (Bernard, p. 33).
        de for all that God has given me. Or to return to
        what we said earlier, it is in the next two de-        It is, however, not simply suffering that moves
        grees of love that I begin to see the wisdom in        us to love God.
        Job’s words and make them my own even if               “Let the frequency of trials bring us o�en to the
        only do so by fits and starts.                         feet of God,” he says, and “surely it is impossi-
        Bernard builds here on the difference in the di-       ble” that we not “begin to know Him, and, kno-
        vine effort displayed in crea�on and redemp�-          wing Him, ... discern His sweetness.” This know-
        on. Crea�on, he says, is effortless--a word spo-       ledge of divine goodness born from an awaren-
        ken--while the la�er is characterized by divine        ess of our need soon brings us “to love Him
        “hardship” (McCabe, pp. 36-44). It is the con-         rightly, far more for the sweetness and beauty
        trast between crea�on and redemp�on that               that we find in Him than for our own self-inte-
        leads the soul to come to love God not simply          rest” (p. 33)
        for His ac�ons but for Himself:
        If I owe my whole self to my Creator, what do I        We mustn’t allow the real but transitory cha-
        not owe to my Redeemer, and to such a Redee-           racter of pain and suffering to obscure the
        mer! It was a far less work to create, than to re-     wholly posi�ve if fallen character crea�on has
        deem; for God had but to speak the word and            here for Bernard. Again to be creatures means
        all things were made; but to repair the fall of        we are dependent not only on God but each
        that, which one word had created, what won-            other. While I may at first resist one or both of
        ders had He ... to perform, what cruel�es, nay,        its forms, it is this dual dependency that is the
        what humilia�ons, had He ... to suffer! (Ber-          source of my iden�ty and so of my freedom, ra-
        nard, p. 24)                                           �onality, and goodness that “makes [me] seek
                                                               ardently” (p. 11) Him Who is our Creator and
        It is here, nestled between his theology of crea-      Redeemer.
        �on and redemp�on, that Bernard’s spirituality
        of love flowers. In crea�on God gives me my-           Suffering also reveals a new facet of our depen-
        self; in redemp�on, I am restored to myself but        dence upon the Creator and the crea�on. “The
        now because God has given Himself to me.               necessi�es of this life,” we read “are a kind of
                                                               language proclaiming in transports of joy and
        As I come to understand that I have been given         thanksgiving the blessings of which they have
        not just the gi� of self but the Gi� of the Giver,     taught us the value.” It is through our depen-
        I become able and willing to respond in love,          dence on the material world (i.e., the “necessi-
        with the desire to give myself to God. It is only      �es of life”) that we come to the bodily know-
        in giving myself to God (devo�o; see McCabe,           ledge of God. It is this knowledge, especially as
        pp. 38, 43), that I find myself. “For whoever de-      embodied in the sacraments, that is the source
        sires to save his life will lose it, but whoever lo-   of the Chris�an’s gra�tude to God for the gi� of
        ses his life for My sake will find it” (Ma�hew         our lives in all their social and material comple-
        16:25, NKJV).                                          xity. Having tasted for ourselves divine joy, it


                                                           31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36