Page 33 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 19
P. 33

becomes “easy enough to obey the precept [to]
        love our neighbour as ourself” (p. 33).                Love & Human Iden�ty
                                                               The first lesson is that the convergence of love
        Loving the Self for God’s Sake                         and human iden�ty is cri�cal for all human
        Here Bernard’s work takes a surprising turn.           beings. “When we look inside ourselves,” we
        In his view, there comes a point when we come          must do so being careful to retain “the inward
        to love ourselves not narcissis�cally but becau-       recollec�on of who we are.” If we don’t “we
        se of our obedience to God. While surprising           run the risk of ac�ng contrary to our nature or
        this makes sense. A�er all, what is obedience          le�ng the evil one slip into that central place of
        except to join our will to the will of God? If God     heart and there exert an influence” (McCabe,
        loves me and I make His will my own then how           p. 23).
        can I fail to love myself as well? But, again, Ber-
        nard offers us a sober warning.                        If this is true for me personally, how much more
                                                               is it necessary when I help others to make the
        Given the struggles of living in a fallen world,       same inward turn? If forge�ulness of my own
        "We may not hope to possess the fourth degree          deepest iden�ty is a great, self-inflicted wound
        of love, or rather to be possessed by it, un�l we      on my own soul, how is not an even greater fai-
        have put on a body spiritual and immortal, pure        lure when I am similarly forge�ul when I seek
        and calm, obedient and subject in all to the spi-      to guide those who come to me for help?
        rit” (p. 36). Love’s highest degree, in other
        words, is an eschatological reality. And while it      Bernard reminds us that I owe those I serve and
        doesn’t happen without our par�cipa�on, it is          what they have a right to expect from me, is not
        not “our doing, but only the work of the power         snappy life hacks but guidance in an “inward
        of God in favour of such as please Him.” While         contempla�ve gaze in the light of the truth.”
        we may have glimpses of this “perfect love” we         The “careful guarding of the heart and unflin-
        will only experience it fully in the life to come      ching honesty about what we see there” is
        because it is only then “when neither the bur-         what we must offer since it is this alone that
        den nor the tempta�ons of this body oppress”           “clears a space … where it becomes increasin-
        us (p. 36).                                            gly easy to see, to hear, and to breath the things
                                                               of God” (McCabe, p. 23).
        This doesn’t contradict Bernard’s view of the
        fundamental goodness of crea�on and so of              Unity of Crea�on & Redemp�on.
        the body. Nor does it mean he denies the in�-          The second lesson is the in�mate and enduring
        mate connec�on of crea�on and redemp�on.               rela�onship between crea�on and redemp�on.
        “The body,” he writes, “is for the soul a faithful     While he contrasts the ease of crea�on with
        companion; if it be a burden [because of sin], it      the hardship of redemp�on, even a�er the Fall
        is also a help.” This is why our lives are “labo-      crea�on retains for Bernard its goodness and
        rious,” because that which is given to us for our      its fundamentally posi�ve role in our redemp�-
        help is o�en a hindrance. This changes at death        on.
        when the body “ceases to aid” but also “ceases
        to hinder.” It changes again defini�vely at the        This unity is first of all ontological. Even in a Fal-
        resurrec�on when the body is once again a help         len world, all that exists does so because God
        and “no more a burden” but “glorious.” It is this      calls it into being. This means that, even in a fal-
        last, glorious state, that we glimpse in this life     len world, crea�on shares in God’s life. The fal-
        when we come to love ourselves with the love           lenness of the world might obscure crea�on’s
        God has for us (p. 38).                                goodness and its par�cipa�on in the divine life,
                                                               but for Bernard, it never obliterates it. No
        Bernard & Chris�an Psychology                          ma�er how wicked we are, we never cease to
        So what does Bernard’s work mean for those             share or par�cipate in the being of God.
        interested in psychology, psychotherapy, bibli-        The ontological unity of crea�on, its fundamen-
        cal counseling, or spiritual direc�on?                 tal unity and balance, are only grasped by a gra-


                                                           33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38