Page 89 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 14
P. 89

because it has already distanced itself from the   why I remembered my intellectual adventures
             nineteenth-century  purely  Aristotelian  inter-  from many years ago. S. Parenti‘s work has its
             pretation of Thomism. The best example is the     meaning here, but it is, in my opinion, insuf-
             work of the Warsaw Thomists (school of Prof.      ficient, because it does not have a sufficient sen-
             M. Gogacz), who made an effort to purify Tho-     sitivity to aspects that arise from research con-
             mism  from  too  much  Aristotelian  influence.   tact with living organisms, contact that is uni-
             They also started a discussion with friends from   que to a biologist. It is difficult to replace this
             the so-called Lublin philosophical school (Prof.   kind of insight with meditation or reading. The
             Krąpiec, Prof. Kamiński and successor).           use of Aristotelian tools, although temporarily
                                                               opening  original  perspectives,  is  not  enough.
             Before  World  War  II,  Thomism  was  almost     It would be necessary to study simultaneously
             exclusively  Aristotelian,  some  of  the  original   many scholastic thinkers, especially St. Albert
             aspects of this philosophy were forgotten. Gra-   and St. Thomas, but not only them. It‘s a road
             dually interest in so-called rational psychology   that  is  just  beginning  to  be  marked  out  and
             expired, even in Lublin. A new search was ne-     point towards the horizon. All trials and efforts
             cessary. If you are interested, please refer to the   are welcome, including the work of S. Parenti.
             excellent review of the philosophy of consistent   Its  undoubted  strength  is  its  struggle  against
             Thomism in English (Andrzejuk et al., Krakow,     very  harmful  reductionism  in  the  understan-
             2019).                                            ding of man. It is appropriate to congratulate S.
                                                               Parenti once again for his excellent work.
             As a philosopher and biologist, I am convinced
             that it is necessary to rebuild the description of   References:
             man by constantly using various tools and keys,   Andrzejuk  A.,  Lipski  D.,  Płotka  M.,  Zembrzuski  M.
             including  adopting  purely  biological,  psycho-  (2019). Mieczysław Gogacz (English version). The Polish
                                                               Christian Philosophy in the 20th Century. Ignatianum:
             logical  and  philosophical  approaches  –  views   Kraków.
             forming  part  of  the  specific  methodology  of   Wojcieszek K. (2000). Stworzony i zrodzony. Wyd. Navo:
             these sciences, each different in nature. That is   Warszawa.











































                                                           87
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94