Page 21 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 21

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             animate and inspire maximal integration. This     validates the Christian emphasis on gratitude,
             is because the textbook narratives that current-  reveals some connections that we may not have
             ly exist actually undermine our goals by incul-   known before, and suggests some obvious and
             cating  and  reinforcing  the  dualistic  values  of   simple real-world applications. Still, it is quite
             modernity which powerfully but unconsciously      possible that people might misinterpret quan-
             impel us to compartmentalize rather than inte-    titative analysis to mean that we are “reducing
             grate faith.                                      people to numbers,” or something like that. So
                                                               I think your question is a good reminder that
             Werner May: I greatly  appreciate the  impor-     Christian  psychology  needs  to  be  clear  about
             tance you attach to psychology as an empirical    the limits of a scientific approach in psychology.
             science,  which  you  also  apply  to  a  Christian
             psychology. As an empirical science, psycholo-    And that actually is the flipside of the issue, be-
             gy makes use above all of quantitative methods    cause the discipline of psychology has not al-
             such as experiments or questionnaires. But        ways done a good job of this. In emphasizing
             can measuring in numbers be appropriate to a      quantitative  approaches  to  the  exclusion  of
             Christian concept of man at all? Would a qua-     other valid approaches, the discipline has - at
             litative approach, such with e.g. the Grounded    times - put the methodological cart before the
             Theory approach (A. Strauss, B. Glaser), be       psychological horse, implying that if it cannot
             more suitable for a Christian psychology?         be measured it isn’t psychological. That implica-
                                                               tion is unfortunate, and not a little silly. It’s silly
             Russ Kosits: That’s a great question and raises   because we intuitively understand this can’t be
             several important issues. Let me start by saying   true. It’s unfortunate because, as G.K. Beale has
             that I certainly think measuring in numbers is    reminded us, we are shaped profoundly by what
             consistent  with  Christian  psychology,  as  long   we worship. If we insist that empirical methods
             as we know what the numbers mean. For ex-         are the only pathway to psychological truth - in
             ample, one study that comes to mind showed        other words, if we commit a sort of “methodo-
             an  association  between  people’s  scores  on  a   lotry,” we will inevitably end up with a very flat
             gratitude measure and their scores on a varie-    view of human nature. You know the saying - if
             ty of sleep measures. So what does this tell us?   the only tool you have is a hammer the whole
             Well,  it’s  important  to  keep  in  mind  that  the   world looks like a nail. Well, if the only tool you
             statistical  measure  of  association  was  looking   have is experimentation or regression analysis,
             at about 400 people all at once and described     human beings begin to look like nothing but a
             a general pattern of relationship that characte-  complex assemblage of “variables.”
             rized the sample as a whole. It doesn’t attempt
             to tell us about any individual person (in other   But  there  are  all  kinds  of  encouraging  move-
             words, you will very likely find people who are   ments within psychology that mitigate against
             relatively grateful yet don’t sleep well, and vice   this danger. First, the discipline has for deca-
             versa). Instead it gives us a rule of thumb: ge-  des  (at  least)  attempted  to  be  clear  about  the
             nerally  speaking,  more  gratitude  is  associated   limits  of  and  proper  interpretation  of  quanti-
             with  better  sleep.  Furthermore,  in  that  study   tative analysis and is currently in the midst of
             only about 10% of the variability of scores on    significant  methodological  self-reflection  and
             one of the measures of sleep could be statisti-   self-improvement. Even more than that, quali-
             cally explained by gratitude, which means that    tative work - which has always played a role in
             sleep quality is complex, and that gratitude is   mainstream psychology (e.g., Anselm Strauss,
             likely only one of many factors associated with   whom you mention, was apparently an impor-
             it (indeed, the authors provided evidence that    tant mentor of Lawrence Kohlberg) - has made
             gratitude’s  influence  on  sleep  is  mediated  by   significant  advances  as  well,  with  the  recent
             another variable - pre-sleep thoughts). But cer-  launch of a brand-new APA journal Qualitative
             tainly information like this is useful for Chri-  Psychology and the expansion of APA Division
             stian Psychology, don’t you think? The science    5 (Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics) to

                                                           20
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26