Page 16 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 16

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             tions are the best and the most scriptural they   ons of the institutional church. The apostle Paul
             can be; we need, in short, to learn to psycholo-  argued that there is only one faith and one bap-
             gize as Christian believers. And this is so hard   tism, and Jesus of course prayed for the unity of
             to  do  because  everything  in  our  training  and   the church. So it’s important that we not be divi-
             culture teaches us to compartmentalize.           sive. However, I think that one of the things that
                                                               hamstrings  Christian  psychology  is  a  kind  of
             I should say in addition that other disciplines   superficiality in our understanding of Scripture
             and approaches, like history, also play a large   and theology. I believe that the quality and, im-
             role in a transdisciplinary approach.             portantly, the quantity, of Christian psychology
                                                               will increase as people become better versed in
             In 2000, Robert Roberts articulated his vision    their own traditions within the church, when
             of Christian psychology in Psychology and Chri-   they have a clear sense of how they understand
             stianity: Four Views. His idea was that we need   the  Bible,  and  when  they  have  mastered  the
             to do careful and deep biblical exegesis and to   theological vocabulary of their own traditions.
             “retrieve the Christian psychology of the past,”   I have much more to learn about Christian psy-
             to ensure that our psychological concepts and     chology from a Roman Catholic who knows the
             theories are consistent with the Bible and with   Catholic tradition and can show me the psycho-
             Christian  tradition.  All  this,  Roberts  argued,   logical implications thereof, then perhaps from
             was a kind of prophylactic, to ensure that our    a brother or sister in my own tradition who is
             psychological thinking is intrinsically Christi-  less  well  versed  in  our  tradition.  Indeed,  it  is
             an rather than modern. Our attempts at inte-      only as people go deep in their own traditions
             gration, he argued, will be severely hamstrung    that it becomes clear what we have in common
             if we’re out of touch with our own indigenous     and where we genuinely differ.
             psychological thought.
                                                               This actually connects to my previous comment
             But it’s important to realize that transdiscipli-  about hidden theological and philosophical pre-
             nary  scholarship  is  not  merely  theological  or   suppositions. Often times, Christians who want
             philosophical or historical—these are the foun-   to portray themselves as “mere” Christians ob-
             dation,  the  roots.  An  authentically  Christian   scure the fact that they actually have tradition-
             psychology is also going to be deeply conver-     specific theological beliefs that profoundly sha-
             sant with the best psychological thought avai-    pe their psychology. I personally think it’s best
             lable. And of course most of that material will   to be aware of those beliefs and presuppositions
             be written from a non-Christian vantage point.    and put them on the table so that we can work
             A huge part of Christian psychology is to draw    with them, and be open to dialogue with other
             upon the vast resources of contemporary and       perspectives. If we portray ourselves as “mere
             historical psychological thought.                 Christians”  and  others  disagree  with  us,  well,
                                                               that must be their problem, not ours.
             Werner May: In one publication, you’ve argued
             that it’s important to identify “which Christia-  Theological clarity will also help in the crucial
             nity?” we’re talking about. Could you elaborate   task (identified by PJ Watson) of “operationa-
             on that a little bit?                             lizing the Christian tradition,” i.e., in creating
                                                               empirical measures of biblical and theological
             Russ  Kosits:  Absolutely.  This  actually  con-  constructs, say, of grace or forgiveness or hope
             nects beautifully to this metaphor of the roots   or whatever. If you’re fuzzy on what Scripture
             of Christian psychology. Christian psychology     teaches about a particular construct, you’ll like-
             will be deeply rooted in Scripture and theology   ly struggle to operationalize that construct.
             and  Christian  faith,  supported  by  the  institu-  I’m glad to say that Christian Psychology has a
             tional church. But it is obviously the case that   tradition of engaging various Christian traditi-
             there are multiple interpretations of Scripture,   ons, and we shall continue to do this as the Lord
             differing theologies, and different manifestati-  allows!

                                                           15
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21