Page 118 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 118

points: (1) an academic professor is the career        with earning a degree in this field is to refine
        that I’m actually called to, (2) it has to be in a     and strengthen my work as a Chris�an psycho-
        field that focuses on the study of humans,             logist. My thought is that if a Chris�an psycho-
        which for me was some combina�on of psycho-            logist builds their psychology on a biblical and
        logy, philosophy, and theology, and (3) I needed       theological founda�on, then if I have advanced
        to go to graduate school to get the creden�als         training in psychological studies, I should have
        needed to be a professor.                              commensurate training in biblical and theologi-
        God consistently opened doors for me to con�-          cal studies. My thesis for this degree is at the
        nue my studies in the field of psychology and to       intersec�on of psychology and theology focu-
        pursue a professional career in academic psy-          sing on how a Christological anthropology
        chology, especially in my current posi�on as a         affects and shapes a Chris�an approach to psy-
        faculty member in the psychology department            chology. Essen�ally, I am making a case for how
        at Houston Chris�an University in Houston, Te-         a Christ-centered view of humanity frames the
        xas.                                                   way we psychologically study and understand
                                                               human nature and func�oning.
        What was the focus of your study/training?
                                                               Why would you call yourself a Chris�an psy-
        I have a bachelor’s in general psychology and a        chologist?
        master’s in research and experimental psycho-
        logy. My background is primarily academic, fo-         For me Chris�an psychology is a unique and dis-
        cused on psychological research largely within         �nct approach to psychology. I have always con-
        the areas of social and personality psychology.        sidered myself a “Chris�an psychologist” in the
        Most of my research experience in these areas          sense that I am a Chris�an who studies and
        have focused on existen�al and social cogni�ve         prac�ces psychology. As a Chris�an in secular
        topics such as morality, religion, and worldview;      psychology I did not ever consider there to be
        my broadly considered experience has also in-          an inherent conflict between psychology and
        cluded topics such as culture, personality jud-        Chris�anity, but I had to figure out how my stu-
        gement, and social class. My master’s thesis           dies and my faith fit together. What I ended up
        was on people’s meta-accuracy in personality           doing, which is quite common among Chris�-
        percep�ons based on their personality trait le-        ans educated in modern, secular psychology, is
        vels within the five-factor model. Essen�ally, I       trying to integrate my Chris�an views and faith
        examined if certain personality traits predicted       into my psychological knowledge and under-
        how accurate people were at perceiving how             standings. I had no awareness of the philo-
        other people perceived their personality.              sophical and worldview presupposi�ons under-
        The en�rety of my experience as a professional         lying modern psychology crea�ng the illusion
        psychologist has been in the academy and hig-          that the secular version of psychology is just
        her educa�on. I would describe myself as pri-          psychology.
        marily a psychology teacher and researcher. It is
        common for most people to think of psycholo-           I had the blessed opportunity to meet and be-
        gists as those who help and heal wounded and           friend Eric Johnson, a prominent Chris�an psy-
        disordered humans, with a central focus on             chologist and career proponent of Chris�an
        mental health. In contrast, I see psychologists        psychology, during his tenure at Houston Chris-
        such as myself as those who endeavor to un-            �an University where he and I worked together.
        derstand those who need help and healing; to           Eric and I’s conversa�ons over that period crea-
        understand the whole person.                           ted a paradigm shi� in my thinking about psy-
                                                               chology and its rela�onship with Chris�anity.
        At the �me of wri�ng this ar�cle I am comple-          He helped make explicit in my mind all the pre-
        �ng my last semester of a master’s in theologi-        supposed viewpoints and frameworks that do-
        cal studies. Through this degree I have received       minate secular psychology and a Chris�an ap-
        training in biblical exegesis, theological inquiry,    proach to the discipline is necessarily different.
        hermeneu�cs, and spiritual forma�on. My goal           I began to realize that “psychology” as a specific


                                                           118
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123