Page 119 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 119

inquiry into that nature of humanity has a long        ze and ar�culate the biblical and theological vi-
        history in Chris�anity that predates the advent        sion of humanity’s nature and purpose. The
        of modern psychology. From this vantage point,         central ques�on for me and my students was,
        Chris�an psychologists see modern psychology           “if the secular vision of humanity in psychology
        as a con�nua�on of historical psychology while         is not the true vision, then what is Chris�anity
        bringing in all the advantages of modern philo-        ’s?” In this period of my teaching, I did much
        sophical thought and empirical methods. Chris-         comparing between the secular and Chris�an
        �an psychologists derive a vision of humanity          claims regarding things such as humans’ essen-
        from the Chris�on scriptures and theology and          �al nature, humans fundamental meaning and
        further define and refine this vision through en-      ul�mate purpose, what is healthy and prosocial
        gagement with Chris�an philosophy and psy-             behavior. I would present the standard view-
        chological science.                                    points and conclusions mainstream psychology
        I iden�fy as a Chris�an psychologist because           would draw on a topic and then I would cri�que
        now whatever topic I study or teach begins with        it from a Chris�an perspec�ve and provide the
        a biblical and theological inves�ga�on into the        alterna�ve. This was immensely helpful for my
        topic and then I proceed to consult the psycho-        students to have a conceptual replacement for
        logical literature and think of how the psycholo-      the secular psychological views we were decon-
        gical findings and considera�ons integrate into        struc�ng.
        the Chris�an vision that I have laid out. My pa-
        radigm for approaching psychology is explicitly        More recently in the past couple of years my te-
        biblical and theological and this framework ori-       aching has shi�ed substan�ally from presen�ng
        ents my development of a dis�nctly Chris�an            the secular view of psychology, cri�quing it, and
        psychology and my engagement with secular              presen�ng a Chris�an view as an alterna�ve, to
        psychology.                                            moving from the Chris�an view to the secular.
                                                               What sparked my most recent stretch of growth
        How is this iden�ty as Chris�an psychologist           as a Chris�an psychologist was a conversa�on I
        expressed in your teaching?                            had with a friend and fellow Chris�an psycholo-
                                                               gist Nicholas DiFonzo. He was lamen�ng over
        Along my journey of becoming a Chrisitan psy-          the standard prac�ce in Chris�an psychology
        chologist my teaching has followed suit. At the        textbooks ini�ally present the standard, main-
        beginning when I was shi�ing from the secular          stream, secular psychological material that you
        to the Chris�an paradigm of psychology, the            would find in most secular textbooks and would
        many reflec�ve ques�ons I was asking myself I          present the Chris�an view later as an alterna�-
        would pose to students in my classes. Ques�-           ve view and or as a revisioning commentary.
        ons about the underlying assump�ons behind             Nick’s lament as a Chris�an psychologist was
        the various historical and mainstream theories         that the Chris�an view based primarily on scrip-
        I was teaching (e.g., man is intrinsically good,       ture and theology and informed by psychologi-
        and actualiza�on is his goal) and about the “ru-       cal science should be the standard view and the
        les” of the field that govern what topics and          secular view should be the alterna�ve. This
        phenomena are legi�mate to study and which             point here has drama�cally changed the way I
        ones are not (e.g., only natural and materials         approach every topic I study and teach on in
        things are real therefore valid to scien�fically       psychology. I feel compelled to develop a bibli-
        study). Through these ques�ons my students             cal theology of the topic I will discuss and build
        would begin to cri�cally reflect on the very           a posi�ve psychological view on it to then teach
        things out of mainstream psychology I was tea-         my students. A�erward I will then teach the
        ching them.                                            standard, secular view as an alterna�ve to the
        As I con�nued to grow, I started to move from          Chris�an view which I have inten�onally and
        cri�cally ques�oning mainstream psychology to          explicitly made primary for them. My goal is
        reflec�ng on Chris�anity’s alterna�ve vision of        forming my students with a thoroughly Chris�-
        humanity. Discussing and reflec�ng with my             an view of psychology into which they will com-
        students really helped me begin to conceptuali-        pare the compe�ng secular views.


                                                           119
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124