Page 19 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 15
P. 19

lies stay healthy in order that the solid foundati-  guratively to talk about the inner psychological
             on of healthy attachments is laid down through    aspects of a person, the person’s will, and in a
             consistent and involved parenting. Attachment     real  sense,  the  mind  (Wood,  1996).  The  psy-
             concerns are not the only problem nor is it the   chological  literature  suggests  that  the  attach-
             only variable involved in rejecting God, faith,   ment process may be a significant mechanism
             or the church. However, it is a variable that can   by which persons develop both psychological-
             be modified through sound psychological and       ly and spiritually. Without secure attachment,
             spiritual teaching, mentoring, and therapy. Our   trust is hampered and without trust, relation-
             understanding of attachment processes help us     ships are hampered. Given that the God of the
             further the kingdom of God by impacting the       Bible is a relational God, trust is vital. Parents,
             souls of the next generation, but only if we apply   and perhaps particularly fathers, have a signi-
             what we are learning.                             ficant role in fostering trust.
                                                               This is a sobering conclusion and more research
             Conclusion                                        is necessary to confirm the ideas presented in
             Attachment is perhaps one of the primary bio-     this article. Research on faith and religious belief
             psychospiritual foundations that best helps faci-  using the theory of attachment provide ample
             litate the transmission of faith. We must remem-  opportunity to engage in integrative work bet-
             ber that faith comes by hearing (see Romans 10)   ween psychology and theology. Understanding
             and belief comes from the heart (Romans 10:9).    humanity as physical, psychological, and spiri-
             In the Bible, the word for heart is often used fi-  tual is vital to a sound theology of the person.




            References                                         Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional com-
            Bartholmew, K., & Harowit, L. (1991). Attachment styles   pensation. Journal for the
            among young adults: A test of a                    Scientific Study of Religion, 38(2), 254-273.
            four-category model. Journal of Personality & Social Psy-  Holy Bible, New International Version. (1984). Zonder-
            chology, 61(2), 226-244.                           van. (Original work published 1973).
            http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226          Jones,  J.  M.  (2019,  April  18).  U.S.  church  membership
            Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attach-  down sharply in past two decades.
            ment. Basic Books.                                 Gallup.   https://news.gallup.com/poll/248837/church-
            Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separati-  membership-down-sharply-past- two-decades.aspx
            on. Basic Books.                                   Missions Box. (2019, April 26). You’ll be surprised where
            Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol 3. Loss. Basic   Christianity is growing – and where it
            Books.                                             is  not.  Missions  Box.  https://missionsbox.org/news/
            Cozolino, L. (2014). The neuroscience of human relation-  youll-be-surprised-where-christianity-is-  growing-and-
            ships: Attachment and the developing               where-it-is-not/
            social brain, (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.             Murrow, D. (2005). Why men hate going to church. Tho-
            Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd. ed). W.   mas Nelson.
            W. Norton.                                         Podles, L. J. (1999). The church impotent: The feminizati-
            Kirkpatrick, L. E. (1992). An attachment-theoretical ap-  on of Christianity. Spence.
            proach to the psychology of religion.              Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lan-
            International  Journal  for  the  Psychology  of  Religion,   cee, W. (2010). Adult attachment
            2(1), 3-28.                                        measures:  A  25-year  review.  Journal  of  Psychosomatic
            Kirkpatrick, L. E. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the   Research, 69(4), 419–432.
            psychology of religion. Guilford..                 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.006
            Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brum-  Reuder, M. E. (1999). A history of Division 36
            baugh, C. C. (2011). The Experiences in
            Close  Relationships--Relationship  Structures  Question-  (Psychology of Religion). In D. A. Dewsbury
            naire: A method for assessing                      (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the divi-
            attachment orientations across relationships. Psychologi-  sions of the American
            cal Assessment, 23(3), 615–625.                    Psychological Association (Vol. 4, pp. 91-108). American
            https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022898                   Psychological Association.
            Granqvist, P., & Hagekull, B. (1999). Religiousness and   Sahgal, N. (2018). 10 key findings about religion in Wes-
            perceived childhood attachment:                    tern Europe. Pew Research Center




                                                           16
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24