Page 95 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 95

Christian Psychology alive



             to other vital Christian doctrines and themes,    Teaching Forgiveness and Spiritual
             such  as  sanctification,  soteriology,  grace,  rep-  Formation
             entance and the doctrine of God, and the pro-     Theological  education  is  viewed  by  seminary
             blem of evil. It is a window into the “big story”   teachers as unique in it’s emphasis on forma-
             of God’s redemptive program.                      tion, especially in two areas: 1) engendering a
                                                               spiritual awakening and 2) fostering the grow-
             3. They gain an appreciation of potential wea-    th of pastoral qualities of empathy, compassion
             knesses of the Christian understanding of for-    and love (Brookfield & Hess, 2008).
             giveness, pitfalls and blank spots in our theology
             and practice. They have to consider Bonehoffer’s   Peter Cha (2008) summarizes the need for se-
             critique of “cheap grace”, look full in the face of   minaries to intentionally support spiritual for-
             abuse of Christian forgiveness in the scandals of   mation among their students.
             clergy sexual exploitation of children in Roman
             Catholic circles and the enablement of domestic      “In the past, when students came to seminary
             violence in Evangelical churches. In both cases      having been “formed” in their Christian ho-
             abuse of the innocent has often been swept un-       mes and local congregations, being immersed
             der the rug in the name of forgiveness without       in seminary life may have sufficiently rein-
                                                                  forced their spiritual formation journey; in
             reference to meaningful repentance and justice.      such a context, seminaries may not have felt
             One student noted:                                   the need to develop specific programs expli-
                                                                  citly for their student’s formation. Given the
                “I realize  that “cheap grace” has abounded       needs of today’s students, however, many se-
                in my own life and ministry. A grace without      minaries are recognizing that formation by
                judgment. Living life in-between the bookends     osmosis and other passive approaches no lon-
                of the already-not-yet-Kingdom of God has         ger serve their students well. Seminaries need
                created a kind of apathy. It’s almost as though   to find ways to invite their students to parti-
                the sentiment is such that – in this period of    cipate in well-designed formation experiences
                grace – I have misunderstood grace for a lack     that prepare them for their future ministries.
                of intent to judge. It’s not that God has a lack   (Peter Cha, 2008. pg. 35)
                of intent to judge, but rather, He has judged
                – and His judgment is grace. Ultimately, this   Ramsey  talks  about  her  experience  team  tea-
                judgment of grace compels one to repent out    ching a course on forgiveness at one mid-we-
                of gratitude for God’s judgment.” (S.H.)
                                                               stern seminary:

             4.  Finally,  students  learn  about  Christian  for-  Most fundamentally, we trusted (and spoke
             giveness  when  they  have  to  encounter  other     of this explicitly) that the Holy Spirit would
             approaches to addressing interpersonal wrongs,       be present in this course – as we and the stu-
             such as restorative justice and Jewish tradition.    dents read, watched videos, and participated
             In one assignment students stage a mock debate       in conversations in and outside of class. We
             in class comparing Jewish and Christian con-         were, after all, dealing with the dark topics of
             ceptions of repentance, forgiveness and recon-       individual brokenness and systemic evil; we
             ciliation. The Jewish tradition is very clear that   needed to cast our fears on God. We recogni-
             only victims can forgive their perpetrators, and     zed as well that the forgiveness and healing
             then only are obligated to do so when repen-         we were attempting to understand more fully
                                                                  could only be embodied through trust in God.
             tance is evident. This stands in sharp contrast      For this reason, we spoke often of the “impos-
             to  Christian  teaching  relating  to  forgiving  on   sibility” of human forgiveness and contrasted
             behalf of others and the possibility of unilate-     it to the forgiveness that occurs when persons
             ral forgiveness even without repentance. Here        who are broken cooperate with god and work
             they learn about another faith’s approach to re-     to heal the world. (Ramsey, 2008, pg. 122)
             pentance  and  reconciliation,  helping  them  to
             appreciate what is unique about the teachings
             of Jesus but also the importance of taking rep-
             entance more seriously in the church.
                                                           94
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100