Page 41 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 41

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology



             hensible human relationship (father-son relati-   is not the healing of human relationships, but
             onship), is always an open dialogue, in which     the healing of the human soul from sin. Con-
             the unknowable is more than the knowable. The     sidering this, one of the most disputable points
             Orthodox  Christian  theologians  speak  of  the   in the article is the idea of redemptive counsel-
             two ways of knowing God, which accompany          ling  that  mimics  the  redemptive  relationship
             each other: apophatic and cataphatic theology.    Christians  experience  with  God.  According
             The apophatic theology states that human lan-     to  Christian  doctrine  of  redemption  we  “are
             guage is not enough to describe God, and His      bought with a price”, the great price of the blood
             essence is unknowable. As Met. Kallistos Ware     of God (Acts 20:28; 1 Cor 6:20). Thus, we all
             puts it, „Apophatic theology, in its true and full   are once and already redeemed by Jesus Christ,
             meaning, leads not to an absence but to a pres-   Who sacrificed His life to cleanse the world of
             ence, not to agnosticism but to a union of love.   sin and to make man free from his sins, which
             Thus  apophatic  theology  is  much  more  than   corrupted human nature. When we speak of sin
             a  purely  verbal  exercise,  whereby  we  balance   we refer to relationship based on God‘s given
             positive  statements  with  negations.  Its  aim  is   covenant and broken. So, the counsellor is not
             to bring us to a direct meeting with a personal   able to make a client free from sin by any means
             God,  who  infinitely  surpasses  everything  that   because it is not his or her domain. This is to be
             we can say of him, whether negative or positi-    overcome by more strict definition of the relati-
             ve.“ (Met. Kallistos Ware, The Orthodox Way,      onship between human and divine in a person
             1979). However, God revealed Himself in the       whether in his personal prayerful relationship
             person of Jesus Christ, and this is the way of ca-  with God or in Christian therapy.
             taphatic theology.
                                                               In the light of this the role of psychotherapist
             Relationship can be described in a wide spec-     that  mimics  the  redemptive  relationship  with
             trum of personal interrelations and with God. It   the  patient  is  unclear.  Does  it  mean  that  the
             reflects personal qualities and attributes, social   sacrifice of God‘s Son is not enough? Why and
             roles,  anthropological  identity.  Relational  the-  how can the counsellor be a prototype of Jesus
             rapy in its healing process of injured relation-  Christ: if we believe in His Resurrection, and
             ship emphasises loving, compassionate and fle-    eternal life, so He is with us and through the
             xible approaches, by this offering a framework    Eucharist in us? Why cannot the psychothera-
             in which to counsel. The religious views and re-  pist heal just by being fully human in his or her
             lational theology background of a therapist are   human relationship with God, with other peop-
             central to the relationship healing process. The   le and with the patient, thus being a model of
             article is very positive about this. However, the   healthy relationship in therapy?
             core of the relationship between man and God



























                                                           40
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46