Page 37 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology

chotherapy. Emphasizing the loving, respect- References
ful, and flexible nature of God may allow for Brint, M., Oord, T. J. & Winslow, K. S. (eds.) (2012). Re-
lational theology: A contemporary introduction. San Di-
better integration of theology and psychology ego: Point Loma Press.
and better compatibility between theory and Cooper-White, P. (2007). Many voices: Pastoral psycho-
logy in relational and theological perspective. Minneapo-
practice. Many theologians have also noted the lis: Fortress.
practical applicability of relational theology. Corey, G. (2001). The Art of Integrative Counseling. Pa-
Pinnock (2001, p. 153–78), for example, notes cific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
Cortez, M. (2010). Theological anthropology: A guide for
that relational theology appears to have the best the perplexed. London: T&T Clark.
existential and experiential fit. Our experience DeYoung, P. (2003). Relational therapy. New York: Brun-
ner-Routledge.
of freedom and the friendship of God fit best Faris, A. & van Ooijen, E. (2012). Integrative counseling
with a relational view of God. We can seek di- and psychotherapy: A relational approach. London: Sage
Publications.
vine guidance in actual situations knowing that Fretheim, T. E. (2005). God and world in the Old Testa-
God is intimately involved in our daily lives. I ment. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L, & Rizzolatti, G. (1996).
also suggest that theologians can perhaps refine Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119,
their theology in dialogue with counselors re- 593–609.
garding how people experience both the divine- Grenz, S. J. (2000, 1994). Theology for the community of
God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
human relationship and the therapeutic relati- Grenz, S. J. (2001). The social God and the relational self:
onship. A Trinitarian theology of the imago dei. Louisville: West-
minster John Knox Press.
Holeman, V. T. (2012). Theology for better counseling:
Conclusions Trinitarian reflections for healing and formation. Dow-
We live our lives in relationship, whether in ners Grove: IVP.
counseling or not. Neurophysiology suggests Isherwood, L. & Bellchambers, E. (eds.) (2010). Through
us, with us, in us: Relational theologies in the twenty-first
we are hardwired for relationship. Although century. London: SCM.
we live in a fallen world, there is still evidence Johnson, E. (ed.) (2010). Psychology and Christianity:
Five views. Downers Grove: IVP.
of our being made in God’s image as relational McMinn, M. R. (1996) Psychology, theology and spiritu-
beings. A theology which emphasizes relation- ality. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers.
McMinn, M. R. & Campbell, C. D. (2007). Integrative
ship is therefore most helpful. Relational theo- psychotherapy. Downers Grove: IVP.
logy conceives of God as lovingly and intimate- McMinn, M. R. (2008) Sin and grace in Christian coun-
seling. Grand Rapids: IVP.
ly involved with his creation. He is faithful and Migliore, D. L. (1991). Faith seeking understanding.
flexible, desiring to persuade rather than coerce. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
And he chooses to share his power with us in Olthuis, J. H. (1994). “God-with-us: Toward a relational
psychotherapeutic model.” Journal of Psychology and
order that we may exercise responsibility in our Christianity, 13:1, 37–49.
choices and our relationships. A relational mo- Pinnock, C. H. (2001) Most moved mover. Grand Rapids:
Baker.
del allows for more consistency both in how our Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain.
theology fits with experience and in how we ap- (F. Anderson, trans.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. & Fogassi, L. (1996).
ply our theology. Our horizontal relationships Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions.
reflect our vertical ones and vice versa. When Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–41.
Schreurs, A. (2002). Psychotherapy and spirituality: Inte-
relationality is viewed as central, orthodoxy and grating the spiritual dimension into therapeutic practice.
orthopraxis draw closer. London: J. Kingsley Publishers.
Sponheim, P. R. (2006). Speaking of God: Relational
Admittedly, God’s relationship with the world theology. St. Louis: Chalice Press.
Toronto Institute for Relational Therapy (n.d.). Retrieved
can never be fully explained. However, as co- April 24, 2015 from http://www.tirp.ca/therapy.html
agents with God, we are called to both under- Vanhoozer, K. J. (2010). remythologizing theology: Di-
vine action, passion, and authorship. Cambridge: Cam-
stand (theology) and heal (psychology) this bridge University Press.
world and the relationships within and without Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. E., Moody, M., Stich, F.,
Benson, K & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome
it. We are called to draw all into a loving relati- studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empiri-
onship with their Creator and to nurture people cally, “all must have prizes.” Psychological Bulletin, 122/
in their intimacy with God. 3, 203–215.
Worthington , E. L. (2009). A just forgiveness: Respon-
sible healing without excusing justice. Downers Grove:
IVP.

36