Page 36 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 36

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology



             35). The former is seen to be more biblical with   gy which offers consistency between our intel-
             a focus on repentance, submission, and humi-      lectual understanding of God (loving, compas-
             lity. The latter is characteristic of most secular   sionate, and flexible) and our emotional experi-
             psychologies with an emphasis on self-esteem      ence of him can assist counselors in this regard
             and  empowerment.  A  relational  model  can      by offering a framework in which to counsel.
             bridge the gap between “secular” and “Christi-
             an” approaches. Relational theology emphasizes    Third,  relational  theology’s  emphasis  on  divi-
             God’s love and desire for healthy relationships,   ne self-limitation and respect for human free-
             thus empowerment would occur through an ac-       dom can assist clients with understanding and
             ceptance of God’s love. God’s desire for loving   dealing  with  suffering.  Many  Christians  who
             relationship with his people involves invitation,   are  enduring  hardships  suffer  a  second  crisis
             not coercion, and sharing of power. He is view-   in  that  they  wonder  “why  is  God  doing  this
             ed more as a loving parent than an angry judge    to me?” Relational theology explains suffering
             who will condemn the sinner. When people do       partly as a result of the free choice of others who
             turn away from God, He is saddened but always     may turn away from God and thus inflict harm
             longs to welcome them back.                       on others. God does not necessarily cause the
                                                               grief, but he grieves with us and is present to
             However, it is important to be reminded of the    provide comfort. In my experience, this under-
             critiques of relational theology. Although love is   standing can be very liberating for people. And,
             emphasized over judgment, even secular coun-      in my opinion, this idea fits much better with a
             selors recognize that gentle confrontation is of-  compassionate  Christian  counseling  approach
             ten needed; “speaking the truth in love” (Eph.    than does a theology of divine control and de-
             4:15). There are occasions when repentance is     terminism.
             helpful in furthering the divine-human relati-
             onship. This model also reflects the experience   Fourth, relational theology can guide decision
             of  most  counselors,  who  instinctively  empha-  making. Because God is flexible and responsi-
             size divine love over judgment. In my own work    ve to our actions, He does not necessarily have
             in  guiding  patients  through  prayer  healing,   “one”  specific  plan  for  our  lives  (this  is  not  a
             when God speaks to people, they never experi-     biblical idea, but is common in popular piety),
             ence him as angry or judgmental. Instead they     but works with us in our decision making, and
             receive gentle nudges and encouragement. For      walks with us in our lives. Although we are de-
             example, a patient of mine with a severe abuse    pendent on God, we are also responsible for our
             history had an insight during prayer that it is   part in the relationship. And when we mess us,
             more sinful to hate herself than to hate others.   we can trust that the divine potter will mold us
                                                               anew.
             Second,  relational  theology’s  emphasis  on  an
             intimate  God-human  relationship  can  guide     Finally,  a  theological  emphasis  on  human  re-
             Christian  counseling.  This  is  important  not   sponsibility  is  likely  to  be  helpful  in  therapy.
             only  with  respect  to  the  therapist-client  rela-  Although  relationship  is  primary,  the  content
             tionship modeling the divine-human one, but       of  therapy almost always  involves  choice. Re-
             also with respect to healing of wounding from     gardless of the technique used, clients have re-
             previous  relationships.  For  example,  someone   sponsibility for showing up in the first place. In
             who has experienced abuse at the hands of her     guiding people in their relationships with God
             father may have difficulty in relating to God as   and with others, we can point out the choices
             Father. Given divine flexibility, we can instead   they have with respect to thoughts and actions.
             work on a relationship with Jesus as friend. The-  We can stress God’s desire for loving relation-
             rapists may use many techniques, as diverse as    ships with us, but that ultimately the choice is
             CBT  or  spiritual  disciplines,  in  nurturing  the   ours.
             spiritual relationships of clients. In therapy the-  Overall, I believe that a relational view of God
             re is usually more of a focus on emotional issues   has many advantages over the traditional view
             rather than intellectual ones. Relational theolo-  and that these are especially applicable to psy-

                                                           35
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41