Page 81 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 5
P. 81

Church Traditions for a Christian Psychology



             murders his shipmate to escape being killed by    ring, and this includes mental illness, is always
             the Nazis. Left for dead by his enemy, he is res-  profoundly  moral  and  spiritual  and  must  be
             cued by the monks from a nearby monastery.        treated as such.
             It is here that Anatolii struggles with the emo-
             tional and spiritual consequences of killing his   In a manner akin to Freudian psychoanalysis,
             friend.   When we meet Anatolii in the film, it’s   the fool also reminds us of the folly of rooting
             30 years after the war and he has come to embo-   human identity in “the conventional standards
             dy the words of the eighth century saint, Isaac   and ideas of a world which measures the true
             the Syrian: “Through the toil of prayer and the   life and virtue of a man with the yardstick of
             anguish of your heart commune with those who      social decorum and deontology” rather than in
             are grieved at heart, and the Source of mercy     Christ crucified.  At best the former “leads to
             will be opened up to your petitions” (quoted in   self-satisfaction”  and  so  “separates  man  from
             al-Miskīn, 2003, p. 152).                         his fellow-men” (Yannaras, p. 66).  The neuro-
                                                               tic who strives to meet the superego’s demands
             Life  with  a  living  saint  is  not  easy  for  other   (Freud 1936/1993) and the unrepentant sinner
             monks; when the saint is also a fool makes it     are both so lonely “because they dare not ex-
             doubly hard.  Not surprisingly, Anatolii’s radical   pose to [others] their need and their weakness”
             dependence on God is a source of frustration for   (Yannaras, p. 66). But is it precisely this, the ex-
             the other less spiritually committed monks and    posure of my own failure and suffering to the
             leads  to  tensions  within  the  community.    But   gaze of a loving God in the presence of loving
             slowly, over the course of years, even Anatolii’s   human being, which is the real work of therapy.
             harshest critic, the young and arrogant monk Fr   And this is so in the clinic as well as the church.
             Job (a man who—despite his name—knows litt-       But this is also where clinic and church diver-
             le of suffering or patience) comes to understand   ge. It isn’t simply the exposure of vulnerability
             that true and lasting peace comes not from mee-   but, above all, the laying bare of my sinfulness
             ting the expectations of others but only from a   to God’s grace that transforms me and makes
             single  minded  and  wholehearted  dependence     me able to embrace my neighbor in love. It is
             on the Most Holy Trinity.                         this transformation that allows me to become
                                                               the person God has called me to be and so in
             The actions of Fr Anatolii—to say nothing of hi-  turn makes me able to help others become who
             storical examples like St. Basil— “always have a   they are in God’s eyes.
             deeper meaning.” Like the prophets of the Old
             Testament, the fool “always aim[s] to uncover     It  is  this  deep,  personal  acceptance  of  divine
             the reality and truth hidden behind the practi-   mercy and forgiveness that gives the fool “the
             ces of this world” (Yannaras, 1984/1996, p. 65).   audacity to manifest openly the human fall and
             To  those  of  us  who  are  comfortable  and  self-  sin which is common to all.” The fool’s example
             satisfied, “The fools come to remind us that the   is not only a personal challenge but a professio-
             Gospel message is ‘foolishness,’ and that salva-  nal and pastoral one. My sin “is not cancelled
             tion and sanctity cannot be reconciled with the   out by individual cases of ‘improvement’” and
             satisfaction  that  comes  with  society’s  respect   shame can’t be healed “by concealment behind
             and objective recognition” (p. 66).               social externals” (p. 129), no matter how well
                                                               adapted or “Christian.” The great, humbling gift
             R.  D.  Laing    (1967)  and  others  (for  example,   the fool gives is this: He is a tangible reminder
             Szasz 1974/2003) have argued that mental ill-     that neither being mentally healthy nor social
             ness  is  a  political  and  social  construct  more   adjusted undoes sin. My sin remains as an in-
             than a matter of biology.  This doesn’t mean the   delible residue of Adam’s transgression and my
             concept of mental illness is of no value. But we   choices, and it always remains beyond the reach
             are social beings and not atomistic individuals;   of even the most sophisticated psychotherapy.
             nor are we machines who function according
             to the laws of biological determinism. All suffe-



                                                           081
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86