Page 83 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 5
P. 83

Church Traditions for a Christian Psychology



             taught”  (Chesterton,  1995,  p.                                 ly  about  human  behavior  (in
             136).  So with Chesterton, let us                                the  final  analysis,  even  secular
             ask what is it that (Eastern Or-                                 psychology  makes  normative
             thodox) Christianity teaches?                                    statements  about  behavior,  see
             Answering  this  requires  that                                  for  example  van  Kaam,  1966)
             we  take  seriously  the  negative                               but about the end, the teleos, of
             effects  of  secularism  has  had                                human life.  This requires that I
             not only on psychology but also                                  reject the position of those “qui-
             Christian thought and practice.                                  te  numerous  today,  who  cons-
             It is an open question whether                                   ciously or unconsciously reduce
             or  not,  under  the  influence  of                              Christianity to either intellectu-
             secular ideology, Christian psy-                                 al  (‘future  of  belief’)  or  socio-
             chologists  aren’t  overly  willing                              ethical  (‘Christian  service  to
             to  see  a  deeper  convergence                                  the world’) categories and who
             between  Christian  and  non-                                    therefore think it must be pos-
             Christian thought where it may     Fr.  Gregory  Jensen  recei-  sible to find not only some kind
             not exist or exist to the degree   ved  his  doctorate  at  Du-  of accommodation, but even a
             we might hope. A. Schmemann        quesne  University‘s  Insti-  deeper  harmony  between  our
             (1997, p. 118), argues that secu-  tute of Formative Spiritua-   ‘secular  age’  on  the  one  hand
             larism  “is  above  all  a  negation   lity in 1995, an ecumenical   and worship in the other hand”
             of worship.” Such a negation of    and  interdisciplinary  pro-  (Schmemann, pp. 118-119).
             worship  does  not,  he  stresses,   gram in personality theo-   This is not to say that there is no
             require  a  negation  “of  God’s   ry,  religion  and  ministry.   relationship between an Ortho-
             existence,  …  of  some  kind  of   In 1996 he was ordained to   dox Christian and a secular visi-
             transcendence  and  therefore      priesthood  in  the  Ortho-   on of psychology. Schmemann’s
             some kind of religion.” Rather,    dox Church. Currently, in     observations about worship are
             “secularism   in   theological     addition  to  research  and   equally  applicable  to  our  con-
             terms  is  a  heresy”  and  speci-  writing in the convergence   cern for a psychology that is not
             fically  it  is  an  anthropological   of  Christian  spirituality   only Christian in the themes it
             heresy since what it negates or    and psychology, he is  also   explores but also in its anthro-
             denies is that the human person    affiliated  with  the  Acton   pology and teleology.  “It is in-
             is “a worshiping being, as homo    Institute in Grand Rapids,    deed  extremely  important  for
             adorans: the one for whom wor-     MI where he writes about      us  to  remember  that  the  uni-
             ship  is  the  essential  act  which   the  anthropological  and   queness,  the  newness  of  Chri-
             both  ‘posits’  [our]  humanity    ethical  implications  of     stian worship is not that it has
             and fulfills it.” Moreover he says   economics and public po-    no continuity with worship ‘in
             secularism  “is  the  rejection  as   licies decisions in the light   general,’ . . . but that in Christ
             ontologically  and  epistemolo-    of Eastern Orthodox theo-     this very continuity is fulfilled,
             gically ‘decisive,’” of the Gospel,   logy  and  Catholic  Social   receives  its  ultimate  and  truly
             of those “words which ‘always,     Teaching.                     new significance so as to truly
             everywhere and for all’ were the   frgregoryj@gmail.com          bring all ‘natural’ worship to an
             true  ‘epiphany’  of  man’s  relati-                             end”  (p.  122).  Liturgically  we
             on to God, to the world and to                                   see this in one of the hymns for
             himself.”                                                        the feast of the conception of St.
             For  Orthodox  Christianity,  a                                  John the Baptist. Non-Christian
             true  Christian  psychology  is                                  worship  is  described  as  bar-
             more  than  descriptive  (though                                 ren—of making a promise that
             it  certainly  would  be  at  least                              it cannot realize.
             this);  it  must  also  be  prescrip-
             tive  and  normative  not  simp-



                                                           083
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88