Page 79 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 5
P. 79

Church Traditions for a Christian Psychology



             nothing more or less than presenting our bo-      as it is nourished by the Eucharist. This is the
             dies to Christ as living sacrifices for reasonable   liturgical foundation of both personal identity
             service (see, Romans 12:1-2). The ascetical life   and  the  therapeutic  work  of  the  Church.  But
             has its own intrinsic rhythm of personal renun-   this is only to speak of the first moments of our
             ciation and development, all in the service of    healing. While necessary, our liturgical restora-
             turning our lives over to Christ.                 tion is not enough; for it to be truly personal
             The theologian J. Zizoulas (1985, pp. 49-65) can   our  restoration  requires  ascetical  struggle.  To
             help  us  here.  He  draws  a  distinction  between   be sure, “One would not need asceticism if the
             what he calls the hypostasis of biological exi-   liturgy … was merely church services.” Howe-
             stence and the hypostasis of ecclesial existence.   ver, “if liturgy is heaven on earth” and brings
             While the former is the product of biological     about a true and lasting communion between
             mechanisms,  and  is  not  unrelated  to  love,  it   the human person and God, “then asceticism
             is nevertheless disfigured by death.  Or in the   is demanded” (Fagerberg, p. 10) as the practi-
             sobering words of the Orthodox funeral service:   cal means by which Christ clears “the silt … in
                                                               the depths of the soul, freeing the springs of li-
             Come, brethren, let us look in the tomb at the    ving waters” received in baptism. And just as in
             ashes and dust, from which we were fashioned.     baptism, “It is the Word who acts, but we have
             Where are we now going? What have we beco-        to co-operate with, not so much by exertion of
             me? What is a poor person, what a rich? What      will-power  as  by  loving  attention”  (Clément,
             a master, what a free? Are they not all ashes?    1982, p. 130).
             The beauty of the face has rotted and death has   Ascetical struggle is faithful to the dynamic na-
             withered all the flower of youth.                 ture of human life not simply as it is now but as
                                                               it was meant to be. Adam’s sin “was not a depar-
             As for the hypostasis of ecclesial existence, this   ture from an originally static and perfect nature;
             is life as a free creature who, in response to di-  it was an interruption—the cessation of a pri-
             vine grace (i.e., the sacraments—above all the    celess process.”  Though wounded, the human
             Eucharist), enters into an intimate relationship   person “did not lose . . . free will.” Instead Adam
             with God.  Having first asked God to drive out    “chose  to  exercise  his  will  outside  and  even
             from the person about to be baptized “every evil   against  that  of  his  Creator,  which  necessarily
             and unclean spirit hiding and lurking in his/her   weakened his own will and restricted its scope.”
             heart”, the priest asks that God make the person  The First Man “did not ‘fall’ into a state where
                                                               his nature became sinful.  He chose to remain
               …a rational sheep of the flock of your Christ,   and indulge in his own undeified nature, refu-
               an honoured member of your Church, a ves-       sing  the  grace  (and  concomitant  deification)
               sel made holy, a child of light and an heir of   that God offered.” The result of this depravation
               your Kingdom. So that, having lived in ac-      of “interior grace” is “slavery” I find myself in
               cordance with your commandments, preser-
               ving  the  seal  undamaged  and  keeping  his/  a state of existential and ontological loneliness,
               her garment undefiled, he/she may attain to     unable to “bridge the separation, or rather reo-
               the blessedness of the Saints in your King-     pen the bridge” between myself and God (Au-
               dom (Orthodox service of Baptism).              xentios, 1982, pp. 8-9).  Or, as the Apostle Paul
                                                               reminds me, I am a “slave to sin” (see Romans
             With this primordial relationship restored, the   6, NKJV).
             other, secondary relationships with self, others   Our  fallen  condition  is  the  poisoned  fruit
             and creation, are likewise healed.                of  Adam’s  refusal  to  accept  a  life  of  ascetical
                                                               struggle. In the words of a hymn from the last
             Asceticism: The Path of Our Return to Love        Sunday before Lent:
             Our true identity (the person we are called by
             God to be) arises first out of the baptismal font    Through eating Adam was cast out of Para-
             and is subsequently affirmed in the sacrament        dise. And so, as he sat in front of it, he wept,
                                                                  lamenting  with  a  pitiful  voice  and  saying,
             of chrismation (confirmation in the West) even       ‘Woe is me, what have I suffered, wretch that



                                                           079
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84