Page 47 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 47

Barth, K. (1956). Church dogma�cs, I: 2, G. T. Thomson & K.
        Knight (Trans.). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.             come. Journal of Consul�ng and Clinical Psychology, 68,
        Boisvert, C.M., & Faust, D. (2006). Prac�cing psychologists’  125-133.
        knowledge of general psychotherapy research findings: Impli-  Hoffman, M. (2010). Rela�onal psychoanalysis and the Chris-
        ca�ons for science-prac�ce rela�ons.                   �an narra�ve. London: Routledge.
        Professional Psychology: Research and Prac�ce, 37, 708-716.  Hoffman, M. (2013). Born to relate: In trauma, transforma�-
        Castonguay, L.G., Boswell, J.F., Constan�no, M.J., Goldfried,  on, and transcendence, The Table, Biola University Center for
        M.R. and Hill, C.E. (2010).                            Chris�an Thought.
        Training implica�ons of harmful effects of psychological treat-  Lilienfeld, S.O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause
        ments. American                                        harm. Perspec�ves on Psychological Science, 2, 53-70.
        Psychologist, 65: 34 – 49.                             Mays, D.T., & Franks, C.M. (Eds.). (1985). Nega�ve outcome in
        Chris�anson, J. (1991). Understanding the pa�ent-therapist  psychotherapy and what to do about it. New York: Springer.
        interac�on and the therapeu�c change in light of pre-therapy  Moltmann, J. (1993). The Trinity and the kingdom, Kohl, M.
        interpersonal rela�ons. Unpublished doctoral disserta�on,  (Trans.). Fortress: Minneapolis.
        Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN.                       Plank, K. (1994). Mother of the wire fence: Inside and outside
        Foa, E.B., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (Eds). (1983). Failures in be-  the holocaust, Procession of the crucified. Westminster John
        havior therapy. New York: Wiley.                       Knox Press.
        Freud, S. (1964). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J.  Strupp, H.H., Hadley, S.W. & Gomez-Schwartz, B. (1977). Psy-
        Strachey (Ed. & Trans.). The standard edi�on of the complete  chotherapy for be�er or worse:
        psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 209-253).  The problem of nega�ve effects. New York: Jason Aronson.
        London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1937).  Strupp, H.H., & Hadley, S.W. (1985). Nega�ve effects and their
        Freud, S. (1955). Lines of advance in psycho-analy�c therapy.  determinants. In D.T. Mays & C.M., Franks (Eds.), Nega�ve
        In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.),                         outcome in psychotherapy and what to do about it (pp.
        The Standard Edi�on of the complete Psychological Works of  20-25). New York: Springer.
        Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp141-151). London: Hogarth Press.  Wampold, B.E. (2006). The psychotherapist. In J.C. Norcross,
        (Original work published 1910).                        L.E. Beutler, & R.F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence based prac�ces in
        Henry, W.P., Strupp, H.H., Butler, S.F., Schacht, T.E., & Binder,  mental health: Debate and dialogues on fundamental ques�-
        J.L. (1993). The effects of training in �me-limited dynamic psy-  ons, (pp. 200-208). Washington, DC: American Psychological
        chotherapy: Changes in therapist behavior. Journal of Consul-  Assoc.
        �ng and Clinical Psychology, 61, 434-440.              Winnico�, D.W. (1969). The use of an object and rela�ng
        Hilliard, R.B., Henry, W.P., & Strupp, H.H. (2000). An interper-  through iden�fica�ons. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic
        sonal model of psychotherapy: Linking pa�ent and therapist  Books, 1971, pp. 86-94.
        developmental history, therapeu�c process, and types of out-













































                                                           47
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52