Page 52 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 10
P. 52

behavior—there appears to be a lack of neural     to children (Termini & Golden, 2007). Sadly, in
             integration between the prefrontal cortex and     children  with  emotional  and  behavioral  pro-
             the emotion-related brain regions (Cima, Ton-     blems, morals and a conscience can appear to
             naer,  &  Houser,  2010;  Glenn,  Rain,  &  Schug,   be missing (Termini & Golden, 2007).
             2009).
                                                               Lawrence  Kohlberg  was  the  leading  force  for
             Until recent advances in neuroscience, modern     understanding moral development (Lapsley &
             psychology has often been accused of awkward-     Carlo, 2014), with his proposed levels of moral
             ly divorcing itself from morality as the discipli-  development  as  pre-conventional,  conventio-
             ne aligned its identity with the scientific medi-  nal, and post-conventional (Villegas de Posada
             cal model (Goodman & Marcelli, 2010). The as-     & Vargas Trujillo, 2015). Interestingly, despite
             sumption that clients and therapist alike could   the research that is available, there is minimal
             enter  into  a  value-free  and  morally  neutral   concrete knowledge surrounding the develop-
             relationship has been challenged by many (i.e.    ment of one’s moral identity early in life, and the
             Gantt, & Yanchar, 2007; Dueck & Reimer, 2003)     effects on functioning later in life (Kochanska et
             and Burns, Goodman, and Orman (2013) argue        al, 2010), as well as the development of cons-
             that psychotherapy is indeed “a moral encoun-     cience  after  adolescence  and  into  adulthood
             ter and has the potential to assist in elevating   (Krettenauer, Murua, & Jia, 2016).
             and dignifying the client” (p. 2).
                                                               Morality  (and  how  conscience  informs  one’s
             Embedded within a Christian worldview is the      morality)  influences  three  different  areas  of
             belief that humanity was created in the image     psychological  functioning:  behavioral,  cogni-
             of  God,  whose  triune  nature  speaks  to  pro-  tive, and affective (Termini et al., 2009). Moral
             found relationality. God has set the template for   values can differ depending on the individual
             healthy human functioning that involves moral     and could include justice, honesty, compassion,
             living informed by love for God and one’s fellow   generosity, or even being social and lively (Kret-
             human being. The development and nurture of       tenauer et al., 2016). “Moral identity” is also a
             a healthy conscience is critical to our healthy   common term that is a critical component of an
             functioning in community and our shared so-       individual’s “moral personality;” however, mo-
             cial co-existence. It behooves us, then, as clini-  ral identity is more than the specific aspects of
             cians to understand how a healthy conscience      an individual’s personality (Krettenauer et al.,
             is developed, and how it can be nurtured in the   2016, p. 973). Researchers have described mo-
             therapeutic context. This article will briefly re-  ral identity as its own construct that develops as
             view the literature on moral development of the   the individual integrates his or her own moral
             conscience within the relational context of at-   values into their sense of self (Krettenauer et al.,
             tachment theory and then discuss the clinical     2016). Similarly, moral sensitivity denotes one’s
             implications of nurturing a healthy conscience    capability and outlook concerning morals and
             in the therapeutic context.                       is a representation of the self (Sherbolm, 2012).
                                                                Kohlberg defined “moral reasoning’s” as “mo-
             Moral Development                                 ral justifications” (Villegas de Posada & Vargas
             In order for society to function properly, and    Trujillo,  2015,  p.  409).  Also,  researchers  use
             for  individuals  to  maintain  appropriate  beha-  moral  reasoning  and  moral  judgment  inter-
             vior  that  is  acceptable  to  society,  morality  is   changeably, signifying one’s ability to evaluate
             required  (Termini,  Golden,  Lyndon,  &  Sheaf-  situations involving morals and take a course of
             fer, 2009; Villegas de Posada & Vargas-Trujillo,   action with justification for the choice (Villegas
             2015). Morality is necessary for an individual’s   de Posada & Vargas Trujillo, 2015). In addition,
             social  functioning,  as  it  deciphers  right  from   moral emotions are thought to be the emotions
             wrong  (Termini  et  al.,  2009).  Morally  correct   of empathy and guilt, but not be confused with
             behavior  is  particularly  important  to  parents,   the behaviors that are a result of these emoti-
             educators, and individuals that provide services   ons (Sherbolm, 2012; Termini & Golden, 2007).

                                                           50
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57