Page 55 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 10
P. 55

butions of attachment theory to the nurture of    ented (Hardy, 2007). Individuals with an avoi-
             conscience.                                       dant  style  reject  attempts  of  connection,  feel
                                                               uncomfortable with intimate relationships, and
             Attachment and the Development of Consci-         tend  to  avoid  intimacy  (Alhusen  et  al.,  2013:
             ence                                              Hardy,  2007).  Those  with  an  anxious  attach-
             Bowlby (1982), known as the father of Attach-     ment desire and seek out intimate relationships,
             ment theory, believed focusing on a child’s ear-  yet fear rejection and do not trust they have the
             liest relationships with their caregivers would be   ability to cultivate deep relationships that will
             the best indicator of their personality develop-  last (Alhusen et al., 2013). The disorganized sty-
             ment. These early attachments, whether secure     le, which tends to be a result of abuse or malt-
             or insecure, are crucial for the development of   reatment, is a combination of the other two sty-
             the physical, psychological, and social health of   les in which the individual vacillates between
             a child and become the foundation for one’s at-   seeking  connection  and  rejecting  it  (Hardy,
             tachment style into adulthood (Alhusen, Hayat,    2007). Bowlby (1982) believed those with inse-
             & Gross, 2013; Hardy, 2007).                      cure attachment styles tend to view the world
             Exchanges that take place between child and ca-   as unreliable and unpredictable, which triggers
             regiver “provide a foundation for neurological    either  fight  or  flight  responses.  Many  studies
             development and lead to the creation of neural    have shown that children with insecure attach-
             networks  (particularly  in  the  right  hemisphe-  ment struggle to develop an adequate consci-
             re)” that are responsible for a person’s sense of   ence, show less empathy than securely attached
             self, one’s ability to regulate physical reactions to   children, handle negative emotion poorly, exhi-
             affective stimuli, and emotion regulation (Har-   bit non-empathic behaviors, and are at risk for
             dy, 2007, p. 28). Lack of attachment can lead to   developing antisocial behaviors (Kersterbaum,
             underdeveloped  neural  integration,  over-acti-  Farber,  &  Sroufe,  1989;  Kochanska,  Forman,
             vation  of  certain  parts  of  the  brain,  enduring   Aksan, & Dunbar, 2005; van Ijzendoorn, 1997).
             hyperarousal, and mental illness (Corbin, 2007;   Research has also consistently demonstrated a
             Malhi et al., 2015).                              high correlation between insecure attachment
                                                               styles and symptoms such as aggression, sha-
             Different styles of attachment are formed from    me, low self-esteem, hyperactivity, anxiety, de-
             the quality of these interactions, which fall into   pression,  and  a  variety  of  behavior  problems
             a secure or insecure attachment category (Har-    (Alajgerdi, Sarabian, & Asgharipour, 2015; Al-
             dy, 2007). A secure attachment style is develo-   Yagon, 2008; Muris et al., 2014).
             ped from having a secure base in which a child,   The development of conscience, which lays the
             upon  separation  from  their  caregiver,  will  at-  foundation for moral behavior, is a crucial aspect
             tempt to regain closeness (Alhusen et al., 2013;   of any society as it assists in allowing the society
             Hardy,  2007).  Bowlby  (1982)  believed  secure   to function properly through majority accepted
             attachment  led  to  confident,  secure,  and  ca-  behaviors (Termini et al., 2009). Research has
             ring adults due to their perception of the world   shown that moral development begins with a
             being filtered through the lens of a secure base.   child’s ability to monitor and regulate their own
             This concurs with a study conducted by Feld-      emotions  and  internal  states  and  attachment
             man  (2007)  which  found  a  direct  association   theory proposes that this is process is mediated
             between mother-infant synchrony and the ca-       by the internal working models formed by ear-
             pacity for empathy in adolescence.                ly attachments (Hardy, 2007; Lapsley & Carlo,
                                                               2014; Sherblom, 2012). Neuroscience research,
             An insecure attachment forms due to lack of re-   however, has suggested that adults who are in-
             sponse from the caregiver in times of need and    securely attached can move into “earned secure
             involves fear and rejection behaviors (Alhusen    attachment” styles due to the neuroplasticity of
             et al., 2013; Hardy, 2007). Of insecure attach-   the brain (Siegel, 2012; Steele & Steele, 2008).
             ment styles, three subtypes have been identified   This possibility holds hopeful implications for
             as avoidant, anxious, and disorganized-disori-    psychotherapy outcomes.


                                                           53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60