Page 47 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 8
P. 47

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             Roland Mahler                                        Roland  Mahler,

             Comment to                                           Dr.,Theologist,

             “‘Psyche’ or ‘soul’?                                 P sy c h o log i s t
                                                                           Psycho-
                                                                  MSc,
             Towards a Christian                                  therapist   SPV,
                                                                  Director of Insti-
             Approach to Anthropology                             tute  of  Christian

             in Pastoral Caregiving and                           Psychology,  Psy-
                                                                  chotherapy  and
             Spiritual Healing”                                   Education,  Swit-
                                                                  zerland
                                                                  www.icptp.ch. He is the author of „Gewissen

             Louw  presents  an  anthropological  study  on       und  Gewissensbildung  in  der  Psychothera-
             the meaning of terms like “soul” and “psyche”        pie“ (Conscience and Forming of Conscience
             within  the  realm  of  “spiritual  care”  and  with   in Psychotherapy) 2009. From 1986 -1998 he
             regard  to  a  wide  Christian  tradition  of  these   directed the therapeutic center Best Hope.
             terms.
                                                                                           Article by Roland:
             Feuerbach  in  his  “Das  Wesen  des  Christen-                   http://emcapp.ignis.de/2/#/116
             tums”  emphasizes  God’s  passion  as  projective                  http://emcapp.ignis.de/4/#/52
             result of human experience of suffering in or-
             der to produce something like Christian religi-   tually Adams and Davies) try to provide their
             on (the general critical intention of Feuerbach’s   own solutions to the problem (from wisdom-
             work  is  not  reflected  in  Louw’s  perception!).   based conceptions to redemptory and sin for-
             Louw’s perspective seems to be quite a psycho-    giving procedures) – but obviously fail! None
             logical understanding of Feuerbach’s theology:    of these, including Moltmann, really succeeds
             Transcience as an unescapable reality of man’s    in giving a sufficient anthropological and theo-
             existence is a psychic reality and is encountered   logical answer to the problem above – though
             by hope and belief – as psychic states of human   Louw  doesn’t  seem  to  pay  much  attention  to
             consciousness.                                    this fact at this point of the essay. He rather fo-
                                                               cusses on the problem of role and significance
             There is a basic problem in the Christian con-    of “cura animarum” among other caring profes-
             cept of “pastoral care” or “soul care” (Seelsorge):   sions or facilities in the church as well as on the
             The dynamic relation between soul and God is      question what contribution to human wellbeing
             generally not clearly enough considered neither   a “cura animarum” could provide in our egoist
             by  Christian  anthropology  nor  by  (systema-   culture.
             tic)  theology  itself.  The  question  is:  based  on
             which conception of God’s presence in human       “Pastoral care” seems not to be quite the same
             soul and therefore for what reason and by what    as “shepherding” and it is not quite the same
             means will a Christian counsellor induce God      as general psychological counselling either. In
             as  a  psychic  factor?  Louw  mentions  different   my opinion it is mainly the acting position of
             conceptions, i.e. Moltmanns theology of hope.     the pastor / priest which makes the difference –
             Hope is indeed a strong psychic energy in order   not so much the contents and issues of the care
             to motivate man’s action. Hope as a matter of     process. It is the very position in between God
             Faith has therefore always been one of the main   and man endowed with a singular mandat and
             issues  in  “pastoral  care”  or  (as  Louw  writes)   characterised  by  the  intention  of  reconciliati-
             “cura animarum”, the programmatic statement       on (2 Cor 5,20) that gives this role an unique
             of Gregor the Great in the 6th century. Other     shape. In this vicarious role (representing the
             explanations of “soul care” or “cura anminarum”   church and representing Christ) “pastoral care”
             (Anderson, Clebsch, Jaeckle, Nauer and even-      fills in a very different gap than psychotherapy
                                                           46
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52