Page 40 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 8
P. 40

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             Christianity – the so-called desert fathers and   may be headed for extinction” (Cox 1995: xv).
             their quest for God (Leech 1985:130). This re-
             discovery of the realm of interiority and trans-  As pointed out by Davie et al. (2002:23):
             cendence (Thayer 1985:25) coincides with a dis-   “The story of secularization is primarily a story of
             covery of the value of symbolic structures and    the tensions, conflicts and patterns of differentia-
             religious experience (Thayer 1985:29).  Due to    tion between religious and worldly regimes. The
                                                  3
             the  notion  of  spirituality  the  emphasis  is  less   European concept of secularization refers to a
                                                               particular historical process of transformation of
             on self – actualization, behaviouristic theories   Western Christendom and might not be directly
             and the classical psychoanalytic theories of hu-  applicable to other world religions with very dif-
             manistic psychology (Thayer 1985:41-42), and      ferent modes of structuration of the sacred and
             more  on  the  interconnectedness  between  life   profane realms. It could hardly be applicable, for
             and transcendence, human existence and God.       instance, to such ‘religions’ as Confucianism or
             Spirituality became a search for ‘meta – egoic’   Taoism, insofar as they are not characterized by
             experience (Leech 19878).                         high tension with ‘the world’ and have no eccle-
                                                               siastical organization.”

             Instead of the Western dualism and distinction
             between spirit and matter, spirituality became    To  my  mind,  Waaijman  (2004)  has  done  the
             since the nineties and the beginning of the 21st   most extensive research on spirituality. He ex-
             century,  the  standard  formula  for  the  theory   plains the complexity of the concept in its rela-
             and practice of “life in the Spirit” and disciple-  tionship to nous and pneuma, as well as to the
             ship (Sheldrake 1995: 514). According to Sheld-   biblical concepts of devotion (eusebeia), holi-
             rake (2007: 1-5) there is a lot of ‘fuzziness’ about   ness,  mercy/charity,  and  perfection  (2003:314
             the meaning of ‘spirituality’ in many professio-  – 332). (See also Endres 2002:143 – 155). Ac-
             nal  circles.  Nevertheless,  he  suggests  that  the   cording  to  Waaijman,  spirituality  is  an  expo-
             word  ‘spirituality’  refers  to  the  deepest  values   nent of the French spiritualite (Latin: spirituali-
             and meanings by which people seek to live. The    tas) with roots in the Biblical field of meaning:
             concept therefore implies some kind of vision     ruach/pneuma  (2004:359).  Spirituality  repre-
             of the human spirit and of what will assist it to   sents both the divine perspective as well as the
             achieve full potential.                           human  spirit.  It  includes  ascetic  and  mystical
                                                               experiences as related to both the Biblical tra-
             Spirituality  started  to  emphasize  emotive  ex-  dition  (ruach)  and  Hellenistic  intuition  and
             pressions  of  intimacy  with  God  within  many   knowledge (nous). At stake is the relationship
             acts  of  public  worship  and  service  (Drishill   between the divine Spirit/Pneuma and the hu-
             1999:8).                                          man spirit/soul within the reality of life.


             Due  to  globalization  and  technology  with  its   The  rediscovery  of  the  value  of  spirituality
             ‘compression of time’, a need for spiritual lea-  within  therapy  and  counselling  helped  pasto-
             dership  developed.  Secularization  created  a   ral  care  to  get  rid  of  the  domination  of  psy-
             spiritual  vacuum  (Blackcaby  2001:5-11).  It  is   chotherapy. Depending on different schools of
             therefore no surprise why H Cox, the author of    interpretation, pastoral care was either merely
             the Secular City (1965), revised his own theory   a variant of proclamation (a sort of homiletic
             on secularism. In his book, Fire from Heaven      procedure or liturgical gesture/prayer) or a va-
             (1995), he acknowledged that his projection in    riant of the culture of self-actualization or self
             the sixties proofed to be wrong. Instead of se-   –maintenance (Gerkin 1997:49).
             cularism  that  is  endangering  spirituality,  it  is
             rather spirituality that is destroying secularism.   However,  the  notion  of  spirituality  opens  up
             “Today  it  is  a  secularity,  not  spirituality  that   new avenues for soul care. It challenges pastoral
                                                               care to reframe its view on soul as a substantial
             3  About  the  interplay  between  faith  and  experience   entity separated from body and life to soul as a
             within a theology of spirituality, see Ruhbach 1987:23-25;   vital ingredient of all of human, social and en-
             sola experientia facit theologum.
                                                           39
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45