Page 32 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 8
P. 32

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             ‘Soul care’: the psychological reduction of       The  influence  of  the  Enlightenment  on  ‘soul
             shepherding?                                      care’ can be traced back in its increased empha-
             It seems indeed as if the tradition of cura ani-  sis on the human mind and self (the individua-
             marum with its emphasis on the Christian God      listic self-culture with the emphasis on me and
             with the message of hope is in retreat. The pa-   personal  need-fulfilment).  The  general  coun-
             radigm shift is from a metaphysics of beyond      selling goal in psychology, namely that people
             to the psychoanalysis of a subjective ‘within’. “In   should be led to assertiveness so that they may
             the  modern  world  of  our  encounter  with  the   reach  self-actualization  in  terms  of  their  mo-
             otherness, with the alien or strange, begins not   ral and reasoning capacity became the goal in
             at the borders of the self, but rather within the   many  pastoral  care  models  in  specifically  the
             self, at the very core of our identity, and in a way   Northern Americas.
             that challenges the self-possession of the sub-
             ject”  Davies  2001:xvi).  This  egoistic  self-con-  In  his  reflection  on  the  different  cultural  set-
             centrating reduces hope to merely a self-aware-   tings of the Latin Americas, Ronaldo Sathler-
             ness of consumption: “…we exist unequivocally     Rosa  (2012)  points  to  the  fact  that  in  many
             as consumers. The culture of the self is less inte-  mainline theories and practices of pastoral care
             rested and in need of compassion. Our appetite    and counselling, a kind of psychological reduc-
             for goods defines our existence, and is reflected   tionism took over. It seems as if caregivers are
             in the enticements of the commercial cosmos of    busy to forsake the parameters of their discipli-
             advertising and sales” (Davies 2001: xvi).        ne. Sathler-Rosa refers to the fact that “the so-
                                                               called modern movement of pastoral care and
             Anderson  (2001:320  expresses  his  concern      counselling was heavily based on the psycholo-
             about the unique contribution of caregiving to    gical science” (Sathler-Rosa 2012:131); pastoral
             the helping and healing professions as follows:   care is busy to forsake its own spiritual traditi-
             “Although Seelsorge has a long and rich histo-    on and its challenge to connect life issues to the
             ry in the Christian tradition, pastoral care has   spiritual realm of life.
             been dominated for decades by psychologies of
             the self that paralleled the movement away from   The starting point of ‘soul care’ became the inner
             ”soul” in theological discourse.”                 human potential (psychologization of spiritua-
                                                               lity) (Sperry 2002:3) with an appeal to human
             The Enlightenment‘s focus on human dignity,       self-determination. Sperry refers to Downey (in
             independence and the ability for self-actualiza-  Sperry 2002:3) who timely voiced the concern
             tion through reason, made concepts like sin, pe-  that a psychologized spirituality appears to have
             nance and remorse unpopular in many pastoral      eclipsed the salvific as the governing category in
             circles that embraced the cogito ergo sum-prin-   spirituality. With reference to the North Ame-
             ciple of R. Descartes (I think, therefore I am).   rican context, it was accepted that a person has
             The paradigm switch was to move from ‘human       the inner potential to develop self-healing and
             sin’ to ‘human dignity’.                          attain wholeness. Self-help presupposes a kind
                                                               of  democratic  independence:  the  principle  of
             “The more uninhibited and optimistic the talk     the autonomous self has become the ABC for
             was  regarding  the  dignity  and  abilities  of  hu-  spirituality in caregiving. Spirituality has beco-
             mans, the greater was the need to relativize and   me a mode of ‘self-fixation’ running the danger
             secularize the doctrine of original sin. The doc-  to  reduce  spirituality  to  merely  psychological
             trine appears – in the form of insight into the   constructs.  “Psychological  reductionism  is  an
             finiteness and fallibility of humans – merely as   over-reliance on and uncritical adoption of psy-
             a limiting condition of human self-realization,   chological  constructs,  such  as  self-fulfilment
             no longer a description of the very essence of    and  self-realization.  Intentionally  or  uninten-
             humans” (Huber 1996:120).                         tionally  such  theories  may  actually  promote
                                                               and reinforce individualism and spiritual nar-
                                                               cissism” (Sperry 2002:30). The psychologizati-

                                                           31
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37