Page 29 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 8
P. 29

Christian Psychology as a Challenge



             more passionate understanding of God. God is      ‘spiritual care’ has replaced ‘pastoral care’ as the
             a God with a heart full of passion; God as pure   descriptive work of hospital chaplains. At stake
             passion, the God of pure suffering (die Passion   is  the  question  what  is  meant  by  the  ancient
             pura, das reine Leiden) (Feuerbach 1904:127).     tradition of cura animarum and ‘Seelsorge’ (the
                                                               care or cure of souls).

             The implication of Feuerbach’s view on the es-    Despite  many  variations  within  different  cul-
             sence of Christianity is that ‘soul care’ should   tural contexts, one can say that the aim of the
             essentially  become  ‘life  care’.  The  very  special   care  or  cure  of  souls  is  to  respond  to  human
             field of the discipline of soul care should thus   pain with compassion and to human guilt with
             be the existential realm of life and engagements   forgiveness and grace (Anderson 2001:33). Ca-
             with the existential reality of tragedy and suffe-  regiving is about comfort (parakalein): to con-
             ring.                                             sole human souls by means of the biblical text,
                                                               prayers and sacrament.

             In Greek tragedy, the human hubris (the illusi-   A very famous formulation is the following de-
             on that self-confidence and pride can cope on     finition by William Clebsch and Charles Jaekle
             its own with the demands of life) is frequently   (1964:4): “The ministry of the cure of souls, or
             exposed  to  disaster  through  the  combination   pastoral care, consists of helping acts, done by
             of  a  personal  failing  and  circumstances  with   representative  Christian  persons,  directed  to-
             which humankind cannot deal or cope. Within       ward the healing, guiding, sustaining, and re-
             paradox and ambivalence tragedy is about the      conciling  of  troubled  persons  whose  troubles
             conflict of pity and fear (Aristotle). Meditation   arise in the context of ultimate meanings and
             on loss, death and suffering inevitably leads to   concerns.”  In  a  nutshell,  pastoral  care  is  the
             the puzzle of fate and tragedy with the burning   attempt  to  link  our  human  struggle  to  come
             question: How is it possible to help the human    to  terms  with  the  human  quest  for  hope  and
             soul  to  cope  in  a  meaningful  way  with  loss,   meaning in suffering.
             dying and death?                                  While he was on holiday in Switzerland, Molt-
                                                               mann read Ernst Bloch’s Principle of Hope and
             As  mortal  human  beings,  we  cannot  escape    was fascinated. “I wondered why theology had
             transience. Caregivers should therefore become    let hope, its very own theme, slip through its
             agents of hope if they want to do what Socra-     fingers”  (Moltmann  2002  90).  According  to
             tes had in mind: To be a healer of the ‚soul‘ (ia-  Moltmann,  hope  is  the  core-driving  factor  in
             tros tés psuchés) (in Oden 1983:187). In order    the connection spirituality, future and life.
             to penetrate the mysterious inner realm of our    Very  surprisingly,  the  question  regarding  the
             being human and detect the meaning of ‘spiri-     validity  and  credibility  of  pastoral  caregiving
             tual healing’, we need to reflect on the interplay   has  been  posed  quite  recently  in  a  European
             between ‘soul’ and the existential realm of our   publication. In her book Seelsorge, Doris Nauer
             being human; on our quest for dignity, acknow-    (2010:70) puts the question of the reliability of
             ledgement,  meaning  and  hope.  What  then  is   soul care (Glaubwürdige Seelsorge) anew on the
             meant by ‘soul care’ within the connection ‘God’   academic  agenda  of  theological  education,  as
             and ‘human soul’ (Christian anthropology)?        well as on the calendar of communities of faith.
                                                               A credible, reliable and sustainable understan-
             Back to the ABC of cura animarum   1              ding of pastoral caregiving is possible only with
             In Word and World, Herbert Anderson (2001:32)     the emphasis on quality (Nauer 2010:105-109)
             poses  the  question:  Whatever  happened  to     and the understanding of the Christian traditi-
             pastoral care and to the tradition of soul care   on of wisdom and faith.
             (Seelsorge)? According to Anderson (2001:32),     The challenge is quite clear: in order to convin-
             this  question  has  gained  new  significance  as   ce a secularised society of the place of cura ani-
                                                               marum (cure and care of human souls) within
             1 “Early church practice of pastoral care was called cura   the field of caregiving and healing, the church
             animarum,  the  cure  of  anima  which  was  the  Latin  for
             the Hebrew nephesh and the Greek psyche” (Anderson   should  revisit  its  theological  paradigms  and
             2001:33).                                         their connection to God-images as shaped by
                                                           28
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34