Page 67 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology

with ideas and realities that are beyond what we References
can put into words. Benson, P. L., Roehlkepartain, E. C., & Rude, S. P. (2003).
Lesson Two – We can accept challenging and Spiritual development in childhood and adolescence: To-
ward a field of inquiry. Applied Developmental Science,
mysterious notions like the weakness or death 7:204–212.
of God as related to the infinitely creative love Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of Faith. New York: Harper &
and resurrection of God. We can overcome Row.
denial and laziness and choose to see what is, Fowler, J. (2001). Faith Development Theory and the
staying present with eyes and ears open. We can Postmodern Challenges. The International Journal for
the Psychology of Religion, 11(3): 159-172.
accept the difficulty, pain and suffering of our Howe, M. L. and Lewis, M. D. (2005) The importance of
existence and that of others and still see life as dynamic systems approaches for understanding develop-
something full of a beauty worth celebrating. ment. Developmental Review 25:247–251.
Lesson Three – We continue to deepen our level Kaplan, U., Crockett, C. E. and Tivlan, T. (2014). Moral
of ultimate trust – related to but more than that motivation of college students through multiple develop-
mental structures: Evidence of intrapersonal variability
which we experience in human relationships. in a complex dynamic system. Motivation and Emotion.
We see a trust that is separate from either opti- 38:336–352
mism or pessimism – that is not based on speci- McLaren, B. (2011). Naked Spirituality: A Life with God
fic outcomes. Somehow everything matters and in 12 Simple Words. New York: HarperCollins.
nothing matters. Parker, S. (2010). Research in Fowler’s Faith Develop-
ment Theory: A Review Article. Review of Religious Re-
Getting Stuck – The greatest challenge in de- search. 51(3): 233-252.
veloping this facet is a lack of courage to face Peck, M.S. (1987). The Different Drum: Community Ma-
the fears and anxieties that these lessons can king and Peace. New York: Touchstone.
cause. Many approach and then back away in Schmelzer, D. (2008). Not the Religious Type: Confessi-
spite of the fact that reality continues to make us ons of a Turncoat Atheist. Phoenix: Salt River.
Siegel, D. (1999). The Developing Mind: Toward a Neuro-
hit up against the wall that makes avoiding this biology of Interpersonal Experience. New York: Guilford.
facet nearly impossible. Until a tolerance for the Streib, H. (2001). Faith Development Theory Revisited:
difficult emotions that accompany the pathway The Religious Styles Perspective. The International Jour-
is developed (often learned through practices nal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(3), 143-158.
such as spiritual direction, contemplative pray- van Geert, P. (2011). The Contribution of Complex Dy-
namic Systems to Development. Child Development Per-
er/reading, and/or meditation), people scurry spectives. 5(4): 273–27
back to certainty, to grasping one side of a para-
dox and simplistic beliefs that soothe with half-
truths instead of giving us the courage to stand
up in the truth.

Conclusion
This model does not have the simplicity of struc-
ture that FTD or other stage theories possess,
but it is my hope that the two complementary
dimensions of increasing maturity and free-
flowing, repeated seasons in which we high-
light the four facets outlined above can provide
a way of understanding spiritual development
that may be truer to our varied and idiosyncra-
tic experiences and which encourage a deeper
appreciation and honouring of people with very
different pathways of spiritual development.

66