Page 155 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 155
The Work and Thinking of David Benner
I thank David for making his writings availab- publisher allowed us a generous quotation
le to us, and from them I have selected some I as part of a review. Wolfram Soldan (Ger-
already knew which appeared particularly rele- many) agrees with David G. Benner that a
vant to Christian psychology. psychologically well-founded psychothera-
peutic dialogue, as a genuine engagement
• “Christian Counseling and Psychotherapy” between two persons, cannot take place in a
from “Psychology and Religion” (1987), value-free space, with a high degree of sen-
edited by David G. Benner, was my first en- sibility for the overstepping of boundaries
counter with his work, in the 1980s. It was a being called for.
great encouragement to us to discover that • “Understanding our Humanity”: in Soul-
the term “Christian Psychology”, new to ful Spirituality, 2011 pp 27-37”. David G.
us, appeared in this volume as well.David’s Benner’s more recent books concentrate
article finished with an invitation to a jour- increasingly on spiritual psychology, a psy-
ney: “If Christian therapy is not simply the chology that can be categorised, according
application of some biblical theory of per- to Psychology & Christianity: Five Views by
sonality and therapy, what then is it? This Eric Johnson, 2010, as a Transformational
chapter has suggested that it is an approach Psychology. David’s current concern emer-
to therapy offered by a Christian who bases ges clearly from this statement: “Christi-
his or her understanding of persons on the an teaching has not always been nearly as
Bible and allows this understanding to sha- clear as to just how important becoming
pe all aspects of theory and practice. This human truly is. Sometimes it has seemed
suggests an ongoing process rather than a to support a spirituality of escape from the
finished product. Seen thus, the Christian human condition, particularly from our
therapist is not one who practices a certain bodies, emotions and sexuality. In this, it
type of therapy but one who views himself has failed to take seriously the Bible’s clear
in God’s service in and through his professi- and strong affirmations of goodness of the
on and who sees his primary allegiance and material world in general and humanity
accountability to his God, and only secon- in particular. Salvation as escape from hu-
darily to his profession or discipline.” manity is sub-Christian. Saint Irenaeus got
• “The Incarnation as a Metaphor for Psycho- it right when he declared that the glory of
therapy” from “Journal of Psychology and God is humans fully alive!” Mike Sheldon
Theology” 11, 1983 For its time, I consider (GB), who wrote an accompanying com-
this article to have been a very courageous mentary to “Understanding our Humanity”,
step by David G. Benner. The fundamental concludes with these words: “We must be
idea, that of sharing the burden of the cli- fully awake, live life each moment, seek for
ents suffering in analogy to Jesus, is still im- experiences, engage in relationships, and
portant today and requires further discus- strive to more fully enter into the presence
sion. “However, it is possible for the thera- of God.”
pist to receive renewed strength. In personal
relationship to Christ, believers find and
renew their strength. Today Christ is incar-
nate in the Church, his new body. Ultimate-
ly, therefore, it is only in the context of the
Church that the Christian therapist finds
the strength necessary for “incarnational
therapy”.
• “Pastoral Conversation” in Care of Souls:
Revisioning Christian Nurture and Counsel,
1998, pp. 143-148. Care of Souls was trans-
lated into German only a few years ago. The
154