Page 14 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 23
P. 14

Review of Key Needs-Based Theories of Mo�va�on         sed mo�va�on pa�ern in adults through discovery
        Maslow (1943) developed a somewhat fluid hierar-       of the impact of paren�ng styles during the early
        chy of needs-based mo�va�on theory, based on his       stage of their childhood development. They found
        meta-analysis and clinical work that is s�ll well re-  that parental a�tudes or behaviors and prac�ces
        cognized in the modern day. A summary of his hu-       at certain periods in a child's life were cri�cal for
        man-needs compila�on is as follows:                    healthy mo�ve development. McClelland went on
        Food (Physiological hungers); Safety (Orderly, Pre-    to delineate the Mo�ve Disposi�on Theory (MDT)
        dictable, Organized and Familiar world; Love, (Gi-     with the view that mo�ves direct and energize ac-
        ving and Receiving Love, Affec�on, Belongingness);     �on focused on need sa�sfac�on. His focus was on
        Esteem (Self-respect, Self-esteem and the Esteem       “four major mo�ve systems – the achievement mo-
        of others, based upon real capacity, achievement       �ve, the power mo�ve, the affilia�ve mo�ve, and
        and respect from others. This is divided into Desires  the avoidance mo�ves” (McClelland, 1987, p. iv).
        (first for Strength, for Achievement, for Adequacy,    The mo�ve components also included the addi�on
        for Confidence in the face of the world, and for       of hope and fear-based aspects (pp. 381-408). He
        Freedom; second for Reputa�on, Pres�ge, Recogni-       believed that emo�on/affec�ve incen�ves underlie
        �on, A�en�on, Importance or Apprecia�on); and          mo�va�onal movement and direc�on (1987, pp.
        finally, Self-actualiza�on/Self-fulfillment, what a    116-128; 2020, p. 236).
        man can he must be (pp. 378, 381, 382).                Deci and Ryan (1985), highly respected researchers
        Though the hierarchy of needs did not have a dia-      in the field of mo�va�onal science through their
        gram during Maslow’s life�me, his followers deve-      prolific synthesis of research along with their own
        loped the well-known pyramid. This is further deli-    research and theories development, define mo�va-
        neated by Lefrancois (2013), also in pyramid form,     �on as “the energiza�on and direc�on of behavior”
        as “Maslow’s Updated Hierarchy of Needs” (Figure       (p. 3). Ryan and Deci iden�fied three core needs-
        5.5 as shown in George, et al., 2023, p. 269). This is  based factors in what they iden�fy as intrinsic mo-
        broken down into:                                      �va�on. These are the needs for competence, au-
        Basic Needs (Deficiency Needs) and Meta Needs          tonomy and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2000b).
        (Growth Needs): The Basic Needs include Physiolo-      They emphasized that competence is only experi-
        gical (Food, Drink); Safety (Psychological Safety, Se-  enced as the locus of causality if it is internal to and
        curity); Belongingness and Love (Affilia�on, Accep-    self-determined by the individual (SDT) (Ryan &
        tance, A�en�on); and Self-Esteem (Competence,          Deci, 2000b), “meaning with a sense of voli�on and
        Recogni�on, Approval). The Meta Needs include          consent” (2008, p. 7). Deci & Ryan made it clear
        Cogni�ve    (Knowledge,    Symmetry);    Aesthe�c      that this pertains to having experience of choice
        (Goodness, Beauty, Truth, Jus�ce) and Self-Actuali-    rather than assuming independence from others
        za�on (p. 269).                                        (2008).
        It was noted by Maslow (1943) that basically sa�s-     Sheldon (2011) developed the “two-process model
        fied people were not the norm, and that research       of psychological needs” which “dis�nguishes bet-
        found this problema�c:                                 ween needs that produce adap�ve behaviors, cal-
        But a want that is sa�sfied is no longer a want. The   led the needs-as-mo�ves perspec�ve…and needs
        organism is dominated and its behavior organized       as universally required experiences, called needs-
        only by unsa�sfied needs…Thus man is a perpetu-        as-requirements perspec�ve” (Schüler et al., 2019,
        ally wan�ng animal… The average member of our          p. 40-41). The first is considered “wan�ng” as in be-
        society is most o�en par�ally sa�sfied and par�ally    havior requirements and the second is “needing”
        unsa�sfied in all of his wants (pp. 375, 395).         as in experien�al requirements. Like SDT theory,
        He also clarified that there are mul�ple mo�va�ons     themes include achievement (competence), and
        for most behavior. “Any behavior tends to be deter-    affilia�on (social relatedness). The third need fac-
        mined by several or all of the basic needs simulta-    tor that their research has shown is the need for
        neously, rather than by only one of them” (p. 390).    power (p. 41).
        McClelland began his work by defining what was         Emergence of Two Direc�ons of Mo�va�on Theory
        called “the achievement mo�ve” (1949). Together,       Deci & Ryan describe key historical development of
        McClelland and Pilon (1983) iden�fied a needs-ba-      mo�va�on theory in their book Intrinsic Mo�va�on


                                                           14
                                                            14
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19