Page 11 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 23
P. 11

Both are immobilizing. Neither cul�vates the kind      we conceive of God as micromanaging every detail
        of robust, responsible agency needed for maturity      of our lives, we risk raising up believers who are spi-
        and healing.                                           ritually stunted—afraid to choose, unskilled in
                                                               discernment, and unable to own their lives with
        A Genesis Blueprint: God’s Invita�on to Agency         holy courage.
        A brief glance at Genesis 2 offers theological clarity.
        In verse 19, we read:                                  Recognizing that God grants us agency does not di-
            “Now the Lord God had formed out of the            minish His sovereignty; rather, it enhances one’s re-
            ground all the wild animals and all the birds in   la�onship with Him, allowing deep engagement in
            the sky. He brought them to the man to see         life with freedom, responsibility, and a healthy trust
            what he would name them; and whatever the          in His guidance.
            man called each living creature, that was its
            name.”                                             Agency in the Therapeu�c Space
            (Genesis 2:19–20, NIV)                             Therapists are at their best when they can support
                                                               the client’s God-given autonomy. A determinis�c
        God gives Adam a task—to name the animals. But         theology o�en undermines this, subtly shi�ing the
        it’s not a trick assignment. There is no divine cor-   therapeu�c posture from empowerment to passivi-
        rec�on or predetermined list. Whatever Adam na-        ty. If we believe everything has been preordained,
        mes the animals, that becomes their name. This is      we may treat clients more like vic�ms of fate than
        not a minor point of seman�cs. It’s a theological re-  responsible agents of change.
        vela�on: God grants genuine agency, and that
        agency is good. It’s part of His image in us.          In such a framework, the counsellor may overly
                                                               emphasize emo�onal valida�on while neglec�ng
        God doesn’t desire carbon-copy, one-size-fits-all      the invita�on to decision-making, ownership, and
        humans. He desires a diverse and crea�ve people        responsibility. But a more integrated theology hel-
        who understand just how fearfully and wonderfully      ps the therapist see clients not just as hur�ng—but
        they have been made (Psalm 139:14). When indivi-       as capable. Clients are not merely shaped by their
        duals recognize their uniqueness, they begin to        circumstances; they have the power to shape their
        grasp the vastness of their Creator’s imagina�on.      response.

        Clinical Consequences of a Controlling Therapy         This is the key clinical takeaway: Agency is not the
        This conversa�on is not abstract. It lands directly in  enemy of sovereignty. It is the terrain where God
        the counselling room. A great number of believers      invites us to live, choose, create, and grow.
        hold to a theology that emphasizes God's exhaus�-
        ve control over all decisions and events. This ar�cle  Conclusion: Theology That Heals
        is not meant to correct doctrine, but to examine       When therapists hold a theology that honours both
        the natural psychological and clinical outcomes of     divine sovereignty and human agency, the clinical
        different  theological   frameworks—par�cularly        work becomes richer. Clients are seen not as pro-
        around free will.                                      blems to fix, or as fated stories to unfold—but as
        It’s been said the average adult makes 35,000 cons-    par�cipants in a sacred, ongoing co-crea�on with
        cious decisions each day. To make wise, responsible    God.
        choices, one must first believe that one has real
        agency. But if every detail is already predetermined   Empowering clients with this vision does more than
        and the believer's role is merely to “align” or “sub-  dignify their story—it reflects the very heart of
        mit” to a fixed plan—or else—this undermines the       God. As therapists and theologians alike, we do
        development of mature, healthy decision-making.        well to ask: How does my view of God shape my
                                                               view of people? And in turn: How does that view
        Consider the child raised under a controlling pa-      shape the healing process I help steward?
        rent. The result is o�en an adult who struggles to     Let us, then, embrace a theology that fosters free-
        think independently—paralyzed by the fear of failu-    dom, responsibility, and congruence—not just for
        re, and unsure how to trust themselves. Likewise, if   our clients, but for ourselves.


                                                           11
                                                            11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16