Page 85 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 20
P. 85

The research then proceeds within a similar            psychology frame. This was a surprisingly diffi-
        frame throughout. Compared to the more usu-            cult conceptual corner to turn, but when I
        al posi�vist or modernist approach to psycholo-        rounded that corner, the frame transformed
        gical research, it is intui�ve, holis�c, personal      my mind such that the dissonance disappea-
        and transforma�onal. It is a way of growing in         red.
        conformity to Christ.                                  Indeed, psychology is now more interes�ng to
                                                               me than ever because it is an integral facet of
        How did you come to be a Chris�an psycholo-            my walk with Christ. My research topics are ge-
        gist?                                                  nuinely compelling, and my psychological ideas
        Like all psychologists, I was trained in modernist     are more original and crea�ve because they tap
        research methods, and I taught and used these          into my central iden�ty as a Chris�an. That
        same methods with some success indeed I was            iden�ty now has real, explicit, and thorough-
        unaware of any other way to do psychology.             going expression through my voca�on as an
        But although my Chris�an worldview o�en sug-           academic psychologist.
        gested research ideas or seemed to confirm re-
        search findings, I grew increasingly frustrated. I     You talked about how you express this iden�ty
        some�mes felt that “my hands are �ed behind            as a Chris�an psychologist in your research
        my back” (e.g., it was “against the rules” to dis-     methods; how else is this iden�ty expressed in
        cuss the relevance of Crea�on, Fall, Redemp�-          your teaching?
        on, and Glorifica�on). We were taught, implicit-       In everything I begin with a scriptural frame ap-
        ly, a methodological naturalism (to conduct            proached in a spiritually forma�ve way to gain
        psychology without reference to God). Conse-           a primary personal understanding, then add to
        quently, psychological knowledge became dry            that frame ideas from other texts, such as the
        and unenchanted. Dull, actually. (I think many         texts of modernist psychology. The result is an
        Chris�ans in psychology sense this same disso-         encounter that God uses to prune me. For ex-
        nance, and have a consciousness of two separa-         ample, I have reconstructed my Social Psycho-
        te psychological worlds and a sense of “what           logy course and my whole understanding of so-
        the rules are” for each).                              cial psychology around the concepts of the re-
        For me, the dissonance became acute during             la�onal person (i.e., we are essen�ally rela�o-
        my last sabba�cal in which I had intended to           nal because we are made in God’s image), com-
        write a book integra�ng Chris�anity and my pri-        munity telos (i.e., we were created for commu-
        mary research topic (the psychology of rumor).         nity), and ordered vs. disordered love (e.g.,
        During that sabba�cal, I became disillusioned          affec�on is ordered when it is a facet of a love
        with the legi�macy of the modernist psycholo-          for God).
        gical enterprise. I became (and remain) convin-        Within this framework (or through this lens), I
        ced that falsifica�on is a myth, data are theory-      approach each topic and it inevitably shines
        laden, and the “facts” are not self-evident. I         light in dark places, stretches me, and reveals
        was increasingly aware of the social and poli�-        God’s beauty and glory. For example, I review
        cal aspects of the psychological project and the       research findings on group polariza�on within
        establishment psychological community.                 the frame of weak rela�onal community, that
        At that point, I did not think that psychology         is, communi�es built on sameness (in what
        had much unique value to offer people. But in          ways do I treat others on the basis of how simi-
        that same sabba�cal, by God’s grace, I began to        lar they are to me?).
        read works especially by Eric L. Johnson, but          A second example: I review bystander interven-
        also Brent Slife, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Robert C.     �on within the frame of what it means to have
        Roberts, and C. Stephan Evans (among others),          an ordered rela�onship with others (am I the
        and later by John H. Coe and Dallas Willard.           kind of person who is prepared to see need in
        This led to a paradigm shi� in my approach, and        others and to take risks in aiding them?).
        I began to work consciously within a Chris�an          A third example: I review self-esteem research






                                                           85
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88