Page 29 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 11
P. 29

Crucifixion                                       the  father  that  only  cared  about  money.  The
             Sigmund Freud famously said that “the trans-      patient with whom I have become too at ease,
             ference is indeed a cross” (Freud, 1910). As the   might respond with cool withdrawal and com-
             psychotherapist  moves  from  incarnation  into   pliance, hiding a seething anger at my neglect,
             a rhythm of relating, distortions and disagree-   similar to the quiet but unrelenting anger and
             ments begin to occur. Limits must be set, ghosts   neglect  we  both  might  have  encountered  in
             from the past appear, old battle lines are drawn.   childhood. “Good therapy…puts both partici-
             In the depths of these distortions the Holy Spirit   pants in touch with a pain that they have not felt
             guides us to continue loving without retaliation   before, a pain that enables memory as opposed
             and without sacrificing truth.                    to repetition … memories that must be borne
             In the Mother/Child Relationship                  and grieved (Pizer, 2003, p. 17).
             Small differences between mother and infant ul-   The  therapist,  realizing  the  necessity  of  brin-
             timately grow into more crucial differences and   ging past into present, surrenders to a process
             to a battle of wills. The infant is affectively disre-  in which he or she will endure the pain of cru-
             gulated during mother’s inattention, absence or   cifixion both because of patient distortions and
             refusal to immediately satisfy the infant’s wis-  failures by the therapist that mirror the patient’s
             hes. Mother is no longer loving or benevolent,    past. The patient’s surrender to the process is no
             but withholding and bad.                          less painful and usually frightening. For each,
             The  infant/child  must  discover  that  mother’s   surrender to a process led by the Holy Spirit,
             care is freely given and not the result of coer-  leads  to  growing  understanding  and  care,  as
             cion or manipulation. The mother will at times    well as a disconnection from the distorting me-
             react  negatively,  and  distort  the  pleas  of  her   mories of the past.
             child. She must understand that her child’s pro-
             tests are not the result of evil intent but based   Resurrection
             on its desperation. Mother and infant progress    Resurrection  is  the  point  in  Hegel’s  narrative
             through  repeated  instances  of  distortion  and   where new creation and relating begins and suf-
             clarity, leading to a more stable experience of   fering is transformed into creative possibilities.
             each other as separate individuals with rhythms,   No longer do ghosts of the past dominate relati-
             needs, and limitations. Through this, the infant/  onships, but people are seen for who they really
             child becomes capable of respecting the needs     are. A capacity for gratitude develops with its
             of others in his/her life.                        desire to be generous to others.
                                                               In the Mother/Child Relationship
             In the Consultation Room                          As  the  child  matures  and  separates  from  the
             From the beginning of treatment, the psycho-      mother, he/she begins to see the parent as a be-
             therapist sensitively adapts to the needs of the   nevolent person who cares for them. With this
             patient. Over time, the needs of therapist and    capacity to see others in a new way, the child is
             patient begin to conflict. The therapist who had   now capable of gratitude for the care received.
             been experienced by the patient in an idealized    The early smiles of the infant brought delight
             fashion, is now experienced as a painful figure   to the parents, the earliest responses of an in-
             in  the  patient’s  past.  The  patient’s  perceptions   fant to the good it is receiving. A child’s greatest
             and the feelings that lurk within, trigger enact-  expression  of  gratitude  to  the  parent  occurs
             ments fueled by painful, unmourned, memories      in time when the good gifts of faith and love
             (Mangis, 2007).                                   which the child has received are in turn given
             The  patient  wanting  frequent  schedule  chan-  to others. This resurrection of the internalized
             ges, when met by an unyielding response might     good parent is the indirect gift which the parent
             cancel sessions. In this, we both experience pre-  receives.
             vious memories of feeling unheard and being
             rejected. The person who fails to pay at the end   In the Consultation Room
             of the month might respond to my request for      Emerging from the chaos of the patient’s story,
             payment with an accusation that I am just like    a new birth occurs in which the therapist is no

                                                           28
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34