Page 126 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 10
P. 126

D.  W.  Winnicott---raised  Methodist---intro-    References
             duced  to  psychoanalysis  the  necessity  of  cru-  Benjamin, J. (1990). An Outline of Intersubjectivity. Psy-
             cifixion  and  its  survival.  In  “Use  of  an  object   choanal. Psychol., 7S (Supplement): 33-46.
             and  relating  through  identifications”  (1968),   Eliot, G. (1965). Middlemarch. Harmondsworth: Pengu-
                                                               in. (Original work published 1871).
             he theorized that when the mother or analyst      Hegel, G. (1807/1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V.
             is attacked and destroyed by the patient (cru-    Miller, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
             cifixion) and does not retaliate or collapse, but   Hoffman, L. (2014). Relational Psychoanalysis in Chris-
             goes on to be the solid, caring therapist as be-  tianity & Psychoanalysis: A New Conversation, E. Bland
             fore, the patient—like the infant---realizes that   & B. Strawn, (eds.). Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
                                                               Hoffman, M. (2011). Toward Mutual Recognition: Rela-
             the therapist is not under their omnipotent con-  tional Psychoanalysis and the  Christian Narrative. New
             trol.  Benjamin,  resourcing  Winnicott,  asserts   York: Routledge.
             that the capacity to see the mother or therapist   Winnicott, D. W. (1959). The fate of the transitional ob-
             as a separate other moves the patient from nar-   ject. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.).
             cissism to the capacity for receiving goodness    Psycho-analytic  explorations  (pp.  53-58).  Cambridge,
                                                               MA: Harvard Univrsity Press, 1989.
             from another who cares not because of being       Winnicott, D. W. (1968). The use of an object and relating
             manipulated, but out of love.                     through identifications. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, &
                                                               M. Davis (Eds.). Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 218-
             Resurrection                                      227). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
             To see the mother or therapist as a separate other
             is not the end point of the story. As in the Gos-
             pel narrative, Jesus’ resurrection and ascension
             (Hegel grouped the two) was the confirmation
             of His “otherness” producing both gratitude for
             His  patient  love,  and  acknowledgment  of  de-
             pendence  on  His  outside  goodness  Gratitude
             signifies surrender of narcissistic omnipotence
             in response to the goodness of another be it a
             benevolent parent, a loving therapist, or a be-
             neficent Creator.  This pivotal shift to need and
             humility, through the relinquishing of pride, al-
             lowed the gift of the outpouring of the Holy Spi-
             rit to be received, and be gratefully proliferated
             throughout the world.


             Conclusion
             Like  Jesus’  disciples,  we  give  to  our  patients
             from the excess mercies we have received. We
             love, survive attack, and through our endurance
             supported by the sustenance of the Holy Spirit,
             demonstrate that it is safe to open to the love
             of another. In so doing, we aid our patients in
             relinquishing their hardened defenses of proud
             narcissism, and resurrect within them the capa-
             city to receive and even pass on the gift of love
             we offer.










                                                           124
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131