Page 35 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 9
P. 35

patient distress. Even though some individuals    death  experiences,  repeated  rape,  and  neglect
             are  able  to  insightfully  describe  the  problem,   from her parents. The problem created trauma
             others are only vaguely aware of nature of the    symptoms (she did not meet all the criteria for
             problem  and  focus  solely  on  the  symptoms.   a PTSD diagnosis), feelings of low self-worth,
             Areas that therapists consider in assessing the   and a worldview that was inconsistent with her
             problem are:                                      faith.
             •  When did the problem begin?
             •  What keeps the problem from being resol-       The Goal
                ved?                                           Only  after  determining  the  exact  location  of
             •  What attempts have been made at solving        the client can a goal be established. As with the
                the problem?                                   therapeutic problem, the goal is a collaborati-
             •  Why have these attempts failed?                ve effort between the patient and the therapist.
             •  What has the patient not considered?           Believing that every person has the right to self-
             •  When is the problem not a problem (excep-      determination, for a therapist to make this de-
                tions to the problem)?                         cision on behalf on the patient is a disservice
             •  Who else is involved in the problem?           to the one seeking help (Sanders, 2013). Thera-
                                                               peutic consent requires therapists to avoid im-
             Following a thorough assessment, the therapist    posing their own ideas of what is best onto the
             and patient discuss the problem in detail and     patient. This does not mean that we withhold
             only then should the goal for counseling be de-   our expertise or advisement as goals are deter-
             termined. Determining both the problem and        mined.
             the goal should be a collaborative effort between   There  may  be  times  when  counselors  do  not
             the  therapist  and  patient.  While  the  therapist   fully disclose the intended goal. At times, tho-
             brings knowledge and expertise to the counse-     se seeking our help are not ready to discuss or
             ling relationship, the patient is the expert on her   even contemplate the full therapeutic picture.
             or his self. Both are needed to provide the best   For example, occasionally patients have unrea-
             possible outcome.                                 listic  goals  but  are  not  able  to  recognize  that
             In using Jones’ forest metaphor, we would first   the goal is either unobtainable or unhealthy for
             locate the patient within the boundaries of the   the patient. In these situations, some therapeu-
             forest. We would need to identify exactly where   tic work must be completed and then the goal
             she is, what the area around her might look like   should be revisited and adjusted.
             and dangers that we would need to account for.    In the case of Anna, she arrived at counseling
             In the case of Anna, we might say that she was    asking  for  a  reduction  in  trauma  symptoms.
             reliving past traumas that was causing her great   She also wanted help in healing her childhood
             anxiety,  sleeplessness,  emotional  turmoil,  and   memories  and  forgiving  her  brother  so  that
             some confusion. We would also take into con-      she  could  comfortably  interact  with  him.  She
             sideration  her  supportive  husband  and  child-  further explained that because she was a Chri-
             ren,  strong  faith  in  God,  and  environmental   stian, God expected her to forgive her abusive
             safety. We would also note that Anna’s brothers   brother and forget the abuse so that she could
             believed that she was the problem and should      show Henry the love of Christ. Due to the fragi-
             let the past go. After several sessions, the thera-  le nature of the client, the therapist rightly cho-
             pist would notice evidence of marked low self     se to work with Anna on reducing her trauma
             worth and self-denigrating self talk; including   symptoms before she focused on the spiritual
             her belief that she was “stupid”, “unlovable”, and   concerns of forgiveness and challenged the wis-
             “worthless” – beliefs that were in direct conflict   dom of attempting to forget the violent nature
             with  how  her  husband,  children,  and  friends   of her brother – who continued to display ab-
             viewed her and how she believed that God saw      usive behaviors. Only after some work had been
             her.  For  Anna,  the  therapeutic  problem  was   done did the therapist revisit and then adjust
             unresolved,  multiple  blow,  childhood  trauma   the set goal.
             stemming from significant physical abuse, near    Knowing the goal of therapy gives direction to

                                                           34
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40