Page 50 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 50

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology



             draw this hard line between the two classes of    In  most  of  my  conversations  with  clients,  I
             people, those who are inside and those who are    find myself wondering and asking about their
             outside,  those  who  are  saved  and  those  who   values, the things they hold dear, the life com-
             are lost, those who know Christ and those who     mitment that they have made, or wish that they
             don’t. And we assign all those who don’t know     have made. So often I hear of values not lived up
             Christ to perdition. We describe them as being    to, commitments that have not been kept, and
             “in the world,” as not us, as sinners.            actions that are contrary to how they would like
                                                               to see themselves. I find that conversations that
             The function of our efforts at formulating or-    bring these values and ideals to the surface of
             thodox theology is to describe as clearly as we   the conversation, and bring them into the sto-
             possibly can where the boundary lies between      ryline of the person’s life, have great potential in
             those who are inside and those who are outside.   turning lives around, in discovering and acting
             We  devise  elaborate  statements  of  faith,  bol-  on new, healthier and more preferred ways of
             stered by long lists of scriptures, so that those   living.  I  maintain  that  this  ubiquitous  value-
             inside  will  know  exactly  what  we  believe  and   system that people have can be seen as the echo
             what  we  don’t  believe,  and  that  those  outside   of the image of God. The therapeutic thing then
             will know what is required of them if they wish   is not to seek to convince the person about her
             to come inside.                                   sinfulness – she already knows that. Neither is
                                                               it to help the person “accept responsibility” for
             The Bible itself, however, points in another di-  their problem – she is already over-burdened
             rection. Romans 2:14–16 (ESV)                     by it. Rather, it is to help the person recover, to
                                                               hear again, that echo.
                14 For when Gentiles, who do not have the
                law, by nature do what the law requires, they   RE-AUTHORING IN ACCORD WITH PRE-
                are a law to themselves, even though they      FERRED VALUES
                do not have the law. 15 They show that the
                work of the law is written on their hearts,
                while their conscience also bears witness, and   I call it an echo because it is a sound, coming
                their conflicting thoughts accuse or even ex-  not from the origin of the sound itself (Him-
                cuse them 16 on that day when, according to    self),  but  reverberating  through  the  connec-
                my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by    tions with others that each person has had. As
                Christ Jesus.                                  God created “adam” in his image and likeness
                                                               (Gen. 1), so Adam begat sons and daughters in
             There is in this passage, buried in the long de-  his own image and likeness (Gen. 5). But this
             scription of sin, a hint at what is possible for   is not a merely genetic transmission. The echo
             those who are “outside.” The Gentiles, who are    of the image of God is passed on, imperfectly
             outside of the law, are able naturally to do what   to be sure, in the nurture that the new-born re-
             the  law  requires.  There  is  something  written   ceives from the caregiver. Nature and nurture
             on their hearts. They have a conscience. They     come together to produce this echo. And thus,
             struggle with right and wrong, perhaps in the     everyone develops some kind of internal moral
             same way that the believers of Romans 7 strugg-   compass.
             le.
                                                               In a delightful article on “blue collar therapy,”
             I like to call this capability the echo of the image   Steven  Stosny  (,  2013  Nov/Dec,  p.  28)  writes
             of God in them. C. S. Lewis in his famous Mere    that  “because  I  work  exclusively  with  clients
             Christianity discusses something similar in his   trapped in destructive habits, I prefer the shor-
             discussion about the proof of God’s existence.    ter  route  using  their  core  values  to  motivate
             He argues from the moral argument, that eve-      practice that will bring about long-term chan-
             ryone has some kind of moral compass. Even        ges.” Rather than seeking insight about the past
             the most morally obtuse person, he says, knows    to motivate change, by ferreting out a “root cau-
             when something wrong has been done to him.        se”, some historical insight into the source of the

                                                           49
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55