Page 49 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 49

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology



             to understand how the other hears, and what       think of some problem, not as an identity cha-
             the other values. It requires of the evangelist to   racteristic, but as an entity outside of oneself.
             understand the other’s point of view to the point   Discover  then,  the  fact  that  you  are  not  your
             of being “almost persuaded” himself. Then, and    problem, but that you have a relationship with
             only then, has the evangelist earned the right to   it,  and  within  that  relationship  you  have  re-
             share his Good News story.                        sponsibilities and possibilities for your life that
                                                               the problem has not removed. The problem has
             EXTERNALIZATION OF PROBLEMS                       only succeeded in obscuring those possibilities
                                                               and convinced you that its oppressive ways are
             Let’s come back to the question of original sin.   the sum total of your life.
             I stated above that we ought to start our theolo-
             gical anthropology not with this idea, but with   Let’s come back to the question of sin, again.
             that of our original goodness, which is where     The  Bible  can  be  understood  as  a  manual  on
             the Bible starts. I don’t mean at all to deny the   the externalization of sin. The most significant
             existence of sin. Genesis 3 and 4 describe that   place where this is done is in Romans 7. In the
             soon enough. And of course we need only look      startling passage, Paul writes, “Romans 7:16–20
             around our societies, and our world to find ab-   (ESV)
             undant evidence of this fact. As Neibuhr said,
             sin  is  the  one  theological  doctrine  for  which   16 Now if I do what I do not want, I agree
             there is empirical evidence (cited in Toews, J.,     with the law, that it is good. 17 So now it is no
             2013, p. 90).                                        longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within
                                                                  me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in
                                                                  me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire
             But narrative therapy does an interesting thing      to do what is right, but not the ability to carry
             with this. Recall that the person is not the pro-    it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want, but
             blem; rather the problem is the problem. One of      the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing.
             the basic narrative practices is something called    20 Now if I do what I do not want, it is no
             externalization. One of the things that problems     longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within
             do to people is to convince them that their iden-    me.
             tities – their “narrative identity conclusions” –
             are bound up with their problems. For example,     Notice how sin is described as something other
             the phrase, “I am depressed” expresses such an    than the person. The person is struggling with
             identity. The practice of externalizing the pro-  sin. Sin has a hold of the person. But the person
             blem is to begin to speak not of the adjective    is not sin. Sin is “not-me”. The person is not the
             “depressed” but the noun “depression”, as an en-  problem, the problem is the problem. Or, as the
             tity in itself, with which the client has a relation-  Apostle would say, the person is not sin, sin is
             ship. The therapist responds to the expression “I   sin.
             am depressed” by asking, “How long have you
             had  depression?”  Such  a  question  introduces   The  person,  then,  is  described  as  something
             some  limitations  into  the  conversation  about   other  than  sin.  In  fact,  the  person  is  the  one
             depression, which begin to subtly challenge the   who is capable of not sinning. “There is there-
             globalized identity of “I am depressed.” In the   fore  no  condemnation  for  those  who  are  in
             ensuing conversation, the client begins to dis-   Christ Jesus” (Rom 8:1). “If God is for us, who
             cover within herself that the problem has not in   can be against us” (v. 31)? “There is nothing that
             fact taken over her whole life, but that there are   can separate us from the love of God that is in
             certain areas of her life that have been reserved   Christ Jesus our Lord” (v. 39).
             or protected or retrieved from the problem of
             depression.                                       The theological response to this might be that
                                                               these promises are for believers, for those who
             If this sounds too simple or fanciful, the reader   have received Christ as their personal Lord and
             might try such a conversation himself. Begin to   Saviour, and are now following him. We thus

                                                           48
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54