Page 34 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 34

notes that a theology of the body would have           world and all its wretchedness. Would this be
        been foreign to Calvin. An anthropological blind       the equivalent to becoming a Monas�c or a
        spot no less. The dualism between realms here          la�er-day Howard Hughes? However, Nietzsche
        shows how li�le Calvin saw the person as a             believed that suffering was a spur to self-devel-
                           12
        holis�c composite . We need a theology that            opment, i.e. ‘what doesn’t kill me, makes me
        is ‘encyclopedic’ more all-embracing than              stronger’. Schopenhauer for his part pictured
                                       13
        Calvin’s according to Has�ngs .                        existence in less dynamic terms. He believed
                                                               that life was an infinite treadmill. A boringly
        Can pain ever be a posi�ve experience? Reflec-         repe��ve sisyphusian experience where hu-
        �ons of Philosophers, Polymaths, Psychother-           mans are always dissa�sfied. The things we de-
        apists and Literary Luminaries                         sire are either just out of reach, a frustra�ng
        To this ques�on, most moderns would answer             Tantalus’ like experience, or we get what we
        with an unequivocal No! Western culture in the         want but it is soon superseded by the ongoing
        21 st  Century is an age of radical individualism      new items on our bucket list. For Schopen-
        and undeniable hedonism. In the West we tend           hauer, suffering defines our reality. We can ex-
        to focus on what is in our personal self-interest.     perience happiness, but it is flee�ng. The Book
        We lean towards embracing pleasure and es-             of Ecclesiastes, part of the Old Testament Wis-
        chewing all pain. However, there are those who         dom literature takes a similar Schopenhauerian
        argue that pain can be beneficial. They side           approach     to   ‘happiness’.   The    Qoheleth
        with Keats and see this life as a ‘vale of soul        (Teacher) says that true happiness is not to be
        making’. A place to become stronger and more           found ‘under the sun’, that is in this life. At best,
        mature. Others doubt this to be the case, how-         for Schopenhauer, happiness is merely a break
        ever. We will dip into writers like Marin Luther,      from one kind of pain while wai�ng for the
        Goethe,     Ka�a,      Dostoevsky,     Nietzsche,      imminent arrival of another. For him, life is an
        Schopenhauer, Freud, Jung, and Ian Mc-                 exercise in feeling frustrated and trapped.
        Gilchrist, to mine their wisdom.                       Schopenhauer proposes three ways to break
                                                               out of this miserable cycle:
        Nietzsche (1884 -1900) and Schopenhauer                • Asce�cism – living remote from society,
        (1788 – 1860)                                              isola�on, solitude.
        Nietzsche is famous for sta�ng in Twilight of the
        Idols, ‘Out of life’s school of war – what doesn’t     • Aesthe�cs – enjoying the higher virtues
        kill me – makes me stronger’. Wecanpickup                  of the arts, music, literature and nature.
        here on an informa�ve comparison between               • Absorp�on–engaginginac�vi�esthatreally
        Nietzsche’s and Schopenhauer’s views on pain               capture imagina�on and fully focus your
                                         14
        and suffering, by Victoria Sus . Sus believes              a�en�on.
        that Nietzsche and Schopenhauer disagree
        deeply on existence and the nature of human            Like the idea of ‘Flow’ introduced to us by
        suffering. However, there are some commona-            Csikszentmihalyi.Schopenhauerwasinfluenced
        li�es here. Schopenhauer    15  - the original pes-    inhisthinkingbyBuddhism.Theideaofnirvana,
        simist, thought that life inevitably brought with      reaching a state where desires are wiped out.
        it pain and suffering. And the best way to deal        WecanalsoseetheinfluenceofStoicphilosophy
        with this was by way of avoidance. Suffering           here. Schopenhauer accepted Marcus Aurelius’
        should be avoided because it traps us.                 advicethatweshouldbeindifferenttoeverything
        Schopenhauer’s ideal was to retreat and be-            except the virtues. To only try to influence those
        come a recluse. To have nothing to do with the         things we can and leave those things we cannot.
                                                               There are definite echoes of this Stoic approach
                                                               in the modern concept of ‘Radical Acceptance’.
        12  Lapine, The Logic of the Body                      This concept has found its home in Dialec�cal
        13  W Ross Has�ngs, Where do Broken Hearts Go? An
        Integra�ve, Par�cipa�onal Theology of Grief.           Behavior Therapy, and more popularly in the
        14  Sus, The Collector ‘Nietzsche vs. Schopenhauer, and the  wri�ngs of Stephen Covey. In DBT we are taught
        Wil to Power’ July 21, 2025                            to come to things we cannot change by fully
        15  Miraslav Volf, Odium Mundi: ‘Schopenhauer on
        Suffering...’ The Gifford Lectures 2025                acknowledging and embracing the painful or


                                                           34
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39