Page 33 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 33

6
        by Sir Stephen Fry , he reflects on the Genie          Interface between Theology and Psychology
        thought experiment that is apposite to our dis-        In his book, The Logic of the Body: Retrieving
                                                                                        8
        cussion.Amanencountersagenieandisgranted               Theological Psychology , Lapine states that he
        one wish. The man deliberates and askes the            tries to bring together things that have been
        genie to end all the pain and suffering in the         unnecessarily kept apart: mind and body, psy-
        world. The Genie grants the man’s wish and             chology and theology. Lapine notes that we
        immediately all life is ex�nguished from the           can retrieve a psychology that existed before
        planet. Fry explains, the result was inevitable        the modern empirical science of the nineteenth
        because wherever there is life there is pain.          century. He writes, ‘it is important to remember
                                                               that the psychology of the soul has a very long
        Towards a more Interdisciplinary approach.             history.’ We shall revisit this when we come
                                                                        9
        Pain cannot be ignored, but it can be explored.        to review the Psalms in terms of the psychology
        My approach in this paper is to take an inter-         of the soul.
        disciplinary approach. To view pain and how            Lapine believes that intertwining theology and
        to manage it from a variety of angles. These           psychology, a ‘theological psychology’ is bene-
        will include in the main, Psychology, Theology,        ficial because it helps to resist the modern
        Biblical Studies and literature of various types.      reduc�onist tendency to explain our emo�onal
        This is a similar approach I took in my former         life exclusively in terms of brain func�on. We
        work on the ancient monas�c malady, Acedia.            get a further warning from Vanhozer in terms
                                                                                                      10
        There I inves�gated the interface between Spir-        of the dangers of bunkering down exclusively
        ituality and Psychology. As you can imagine this       within our disciplines. He issues a stark warning,
        inclusive and holis�c approach is no easy task.        ‘it is only when a discipline tries to be auton-
        As we walk through the explora�on portal,              omous and work by its own light only – that
        things widen and expand exponen�ally. To               it falls prey to reduc�onism in the modern
        change the metaphor, every �me we peel back            sense of the term’.  11
        a layer of understanding pain another appears          Michael Polanyi adds further emphasis when
        underneath. So, although difficult, to get the         he writes that, ‘…we don’t know enough within
        best understanding of our subject we must be           our own disciplines. We need to work outside
        determined and use material from different             of disciplines and collaborate with other disci-
        sources. This is why I am tracking a similar path      plines,and specialists.’ Undoubtedly, modern
                                    7
        to Zimbardo and Johnson here. The authors              psychology can augment historical theology.
        in studying the psychology behind Shake-
        speare’s plays take on an interdisciplinary,           Lapine goes on to make the case that Aquinas
        panop�con type approach. Zimbardo and John-            (1225 -1274) carried forward the no�on of the
        son note that they want to extend their ap-            person as a ‘holis�c composite’, taking an Aris-
        proach by adding sciences, art and humani�es.          totelian idea into Chris�an Theology. Whereas
        Indoingsotheysuggestthat‘humanknowledge                John Calvin (1509 -1564) takes a more Platonic,
        is like a ‘mul�dimensional web’ that intercon-         dualis�c approach. Calvin believed that the soul
        nects across disciplines with links that we have       was the seat of the imago dei and needed to
        only just begun to discover’. Importantly, the         be dis�nct from the body to be eternal. Calvin
        authors note that this ‘interdisciplinary ap-          believed that God is spirit, and it is the spiritual
        proach’ helps to avoid over specializa�on and          aspect of humanity that can reflect God as
        fragmenta�on of thought in research. I would           Spirit. This I believe to be a weakness in Calvins
        addthatthisapproachhelpsavoid‘siloworking’             theology and anthropology.
        and building academic echo chambers.                   He believed that the body is of almost no im-

                                                               portance …it is the spirit that ma�ers…a thor-
                                                               oughly Platonic almost gnos�c idea? Lapine


                                                               8  Mathew A. Lapine, The Logic of the Body: Retrieving
                                                               Theological Psychology
                                                               9
        6  Sir Steophen Fry ‘The Seven Deadly Sins’ podcast. Accessed  Lapine, The Logic of the Body
        12/09/2025                                             10  Forword to Lapine, The logic of the Body
        7  Zimbardo and Johnson, Psychology according to Shakespear.  11  Forward to Lapine, The Logic of the Body.

                                                           33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38