Page 22 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24

affec�ng the conscience, damaging trust, Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do
sha�ering iden�ty, and altering self-percep�-
on. Unlike fear-based trauma, moral injury hits
at the heart of who we are, leaving us ques�o-
ning our own goodness and sense of self. Moral
harm isn’t simply a mental health issue—it’s an
ethical, rela�onal, and spiritual wound that re-
quires an enhanced level of care. While psycho-
logy is helpful in aiding our understanding of
the mechanisms of guilt, shame, and disenga-
gement, theology offers a deeper moral langua-
ge of conscience, sin, iden�ty, grace, and recon-
cilia�on. These integrated perspec�ves take us
beyond symptom relief and coping skills toward
the deeper work of reclaiming integrity, resto-
ring iden�ty, and rebuilding trust in oneself, in
others, and in community.
The integra�on of Chris�an psychology and
theology provides profound insights for clinical
work in healing moral harm. This involves na-
ming wounds with honesty, understanding
them within a holis�c view of the person, and
walking alongside individuals and communi�es
as they seek healing and restora�on. The Bible
and Chris�an theology remind us that no moral
failure lies beyond the reach of grace. Even in
our deepest fractures, Christ meets us with the
opportunity or reminder of forgiveness, solida-
rity, and a promise of transforma�on. Ul�mate-
ly, moral restora�on does not mean erasing
moral pain, but learning to carry it differently.
This is where guilt and shame give way to re-
sponsibility, betrayal transi�ons to trust, shame
yields to dignity, and the wound itself becomes
a place where integrity and hope are rediscove-
red. Likewise, it is a task that belongs not only
to individuals but also to communi�es and in-
s�tu�ons, which need to acknowledge their fai-
lures and par�cipate in repair. When psycho-
logy and theology walk together effec�vely,
they can open up a fuller vision of healing: one
that a�ends to the wounds of body, mind, and
soul, poin�ng us toward a redemp�ve horizon
where integrity is restored and wholeness is
made possible.
References
Chaudhary, A. S. (2025, April 14). Why therapy is becoming dern iden�ty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
the new religion — And that’s not a good thing. Medium. h�- Zehr, H. (2002). The li�le book of restora�ve jus�ce. Inter-
ps://medium.com/@Abdulsalamabdul864/why-therapy-is-
becoming-the-new-religion-and-thats-not-a-good-
thing-1bea9794d715
22
harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetra�on
of inhumani�es. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
3(3), 193–209.
Bonhoeffer, D. (1997). The cost of discipleship. Touchstone.
Brock, R. N., & Le�ni, G. (2012). Soul repair: Recovering from
moral injury a�er war. Boston: Beacon Press.
Carey, L. B., Hodgson, T. J., Kruger, G., Nall, A., & Rumbold, B.
(2016). Moral injury, spiritual care, and the role of chaplains:
An exploratory scoping review of literature and resources.
Journal of Religion and Health, 55(4), 1218–1245.
Drescher, K. D., Foy, D. W., Kelly, C., Leshner, A., Schutz, K., &
Litz, B. (2011). An explora�on of the viability and usefulness
of the construct of moral injury in war veterans. Traumatolo-
gy, 17(1), 8–13.
Exline, J. J., Wilt, J. A., Pargament, K. I., & Shook, N. J. (2017).
Addressing religious and spiritual struggles in therapy: Why,
how, and what if? Cogni�ve and Behavioral Prac�ce, 24(4),
532–546.
Frankl, V. E. (2019). The will to meaning: Founda�ons and ap-
plica�ons of logotherapy. Penguin. (Original work published
1955)
Litz, B. T., & Kerig, P. K. (2019). Introduc�on to the special is-
sue on moral injury: Conceptual challenges, methodology,
and treatment considera�ons. Journal of Trauma�c Stress,
32(3), 341–349.
Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva,
C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war
veterans: A preliminary model and interven�on strategy. Cli-
nical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706.
O’Connor, K. E., Vizcaino, E. J., Tung, I., Clarke, A. T., Connell,
C. M., & McLoyd, V. C. (2021). “Hurt people hurt people”: Re-
la�ons between adverse experiences and pa�erns of cyber
and in-person aggression and vic�miza�on among urban ado-
lescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(5), 874–889.
O’Donnell, J. (2014). Graduate educa�on and the cure of
souls. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116,
4526–4530.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and pro-
cesses of self-change of smoking: Toward an integra�ve mo-
del of change. Journal of Consul�ng and Clinical Psychology,
51(3), 390–395.
Ren, D., Wesselmann, E. D., & Williams, K. D. (2018). Hurt
people hurt people: Ostracism and aggression. Current Opini-
on in Psychology, 19, 34–38.
Sco�, K., Hirschinger, V., Cox, K. R., McCoig, M., Brandt, J., &
Hall, L. W. (2017). The impact of cri�cal incident stress debrie-
fing on healthcare providers: A qualita�ve study. Journal of
Trauma Nursing, 24(3), 158–165.
Shay, J. (1994). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the
undoing of character. New York, NY: Scribner.
Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury. Psychoanaly�c Psychology, 31(2),
182–191.
Smith, C. M. (2011). Jung and shamanism in dialogue: Retrie-
ving the soul, retrieving the sacred. Paulist Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the mo-
course, PA: Good Books.