Page 11 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 24
P. 11

cries for help, moral suffering can o�en remain        sense of self and responsibility. They may say
        silent and secret. It then works within, contami-      things like, “I failed the people who ma�ered
        na�ng hearts and minds, all while remaining            most to me” (a statement of guilt and self-bla-
        unseen. Therapists can contribute by avoiding          me), “I never thought I could do something like
        the language of moral viola�on. Therapists are         that” (shock at viola�ng one’s moral iden�ty),
        o�en uneasy with moral language as it can feel         “It feels like the ground has been ripped out
        too closely associated with judgment, too              from underneath me” (a loss of stability and
        entangled with religion or philosophy, insuffi-        trust in the world), or “I know I couldn’t stop
        ciently scien�fic, or ethically risky. Similarly,      what happened, but I s�ll feel like I should have
        moral perspec�ves on suffering do not fit neat-        been able to do something” (a painful struggle
        ly into medical defini�ons or diagnos�c catego-        between ra�onal awareness and lingering self-
        ries, and they do not facilitate insurance reim-       condemna�on from powerlessness). Entangled
        bursement. This also reflects a clinical culture       in shame, shock, complicity, self-hatred, and
        that tends to explain behavior in terms of biolo-      anger, this pain o�en stagnates within. Without
        gy or environment, with less emphasis on hu-           a framework to name or make sense of it, mo-
        man agency, the role of the will, or personal re-      ral suffering frequently stays hidden—unspo-
        sponsibility. Instead of naming and working            ken,   unprocessed,     and    unresolved—even
        with moral rupture, treatment tends to focus           though its wounds cut just as deeply as those in
        on resul�ng surface-level symptoms.                    post-trauma�c stress disorder (PTSD). Unlike
        In contrast, clients commonly frame their suffe-       PTSD, which is rooted mainly in autonomic fear
        ring and pain using terms like guilt, betrayal, fai-   reac�ons, moral injury wounds the conscience
        lure, or wrongdoing, which are unmistakably            and disrupts one’s sense of iden�ty, o�en lea-
        moral in nature. Avoiding this language in clini-      ving individuals disoriented, burdened by sha-
        cal care risks mu�ng a client's deepest pain.          me, and struggling with feelings of worthless-
        Moral language gives expression to the voice of        ness (Litz et al., 2009). To highlight the dis�nc�-
        conscience, naming injuries to trust and integri-      on, the following vigne�es illustrate the core
        ty that cannot be fully conveyed by symptoms           features and differences between a typical
        alone. Far from adding shame through judg-             PTSD response and a moral harm response.
        ment, acknowledging moral weight can actually
        bring relief, affirming that moral struggle is a       Maria and her two young children were trap-
        profoundly human experience. Healing moral             ped on the roof of their home as the waters
        injury requires more than symptom relief—it            rose during a devasta�ng flood. She and her
        calls for meaning making, restora�on, and mo-          children managed to scramble to the roof. For
        ral repair. Used with humility and ethics, moral       hours, she hung on to her children and the
        language can be used without imposing values.          chimney �ghtly, terrified the waters would
        Using the moral language of our clients can            sweep them away from her before help arrived.
        open space for greater honesty, responsibility,        When a rescue team finally pulled them to
        and hope. This is why theologically and spiritu-       safety, her body shook with relief, but the fear
        ally integrated care or interprofessional colla-       never le� her. Weeks later, Maria was incredib-
        bora�on is so vital when addressing a client’s         ly distressed when she heard the sound of rain,
        moral suffering.                                       avoided driving near rivers, and woke up screa-
                                                               ming from nightmares of her children being
        Differen�a�ng Moral Harm from Trauma                   pulled from her and drowning. She couldn’t
        When experiences of moral harm surface in              stop reliving the sense of helpless terror she ex-
        therapy, they extend beyond the typical sym-           perienced on that roof.
        ptom complaints we see with most clinical con-         No�ce that in this case, the wound is likely
        di�ons. What emerges are soul-deep laments             PTSD, due to the characteris�c symptoms that
        of rupture, disillusionment, regret, and loss. Cli-    were encoded through fear and rooted in the
        ents o�en express moral suffering in deeply            threat to her and her children’s lives. In con-
        personal ways, not just recoun�ng what happe-          trast, moral harm does not arise from fear
        ned but also describing how it sha�ered their          itself, but from the ac�ons we take, the wrongs



                                                           11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16