Page 12 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 20
P. 12

Literature Review
        Posi�ve Psychology and Character Virtues               Well-being
        Posi�ve psychology, widely popularized in 2000         Two conceptualiza�ons of well-being have pro-
        by Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000), has           duced different inquiries into developmental
        led to significant interest in character virtues as    and social processes related to well-being
        a means of achieving wellness. Seligman and            (Ryan & Deci, 2001), leading to conceptual con-
        Csikszentmihalyi (2000) found that “psycholo-          fusion. The hedonic perspec�ve (o�en called
        gists have scant knowledge of what makes life          subjec�ve well-being) suggests that well-being
        worth living” (p. 5). This pronouncement s�mu-         consists of experiencing happiness, sa�sfac�-
        lated extensive research, amongst which lies           on, and pleasure (Ryan & Deci, 2001; Ryff,
        character virtues, which are a�ributes one             2013), while the eudaimonic perspec�ve sug-
        learns in rela�onship to others and contexts,          gests well-being includes processes of meaning
        and subsequently u�lize or express to thrive in        making, strivings to become, and fulfilment of
        life (Bellehumeur et al., 2017; Hoyos-Valdés,          one’s true nature (Ryan & Deci, 2001; Ryff,
        2018; Lerner, 2019).                                   2013). These perspec�ves are not fundamen-
                                                               tally opposed, rather they illuminate the
        Research into numerous virtues and strengths           breadth of well-being as a construct. Three ma-
        has occurred, and this study is selec�ve, inves-       jor approaches to the measurement of well-
        �ga�ng humility, gra�tude, and compassion,             being have emerged, including objec�ve, sub-
        due to their links to increased well-being (De-        jec�ve, and psychological measures (Forgeard
        morest, 2019; McCullough et al., 2002; Van             et al., 2011). Due to well-being’s breadth Forge-
        Tongeren et al., 2019). For example, humility          ard et al. (2011) suggested researchers do well
        has demonstrated a rela�onship to life sa�sfac-        to persevere the complexity of the construct by
        �on, stress-buffering (Krause, 2016; Krause et         integra�ng mul�ple views of well-being inclu-
        al., 2016), and producing prosocial benefits           ding emo�ons, meaning, and sa�sfac�on, to
        such as trust, empathy, and behaviors that lead        form a ‘dashboard’ array. In this study we fol-
        to personal flourishing (Krause et al., 2016;          low the dashboard approach to holis�cally
        Krumrei-Mancuso, 2017). Lavelock et al. (2017)         discern what impact Chris�an rela�onship with
        suggest humility may act as a master virtue fa-        God may have on well-being through character
        cilita�ng the development of other virtues.            virtues.
        Gra�tude, is somewhat complex in the litera-
        ture, some�mes defined as an emo�on and                Chris�an Rela�onship with God
        some�mes as an a�tude of benevolent accep-             A rela�onship with God is defined in numerous
        tance of indebtedness (Emmons & Crumpler,              ways across religions and philosophies. An emic
        2000). Nonetheless, gra�tude is strongly linked        Chris�an perspec�ve on rela�onship with God
        to well-being as grateful people focus on bles-        suggests it is both mystery and a tangible reali-
        sings and enjoy prosocial benefits, a sense of         ty that includes the offer of joining in the peri-
        connec�on, improved sleep quality, and overall         chore�c (communal) life of the Trinity (Genesis
        sa�sfac�on (Cunha et al., 2019; Emmons & Mc-           1; Volf, 1996). The Bible includes many exhorta-
        Cullough, 2003). Finally, compassion serves as         �ons to commune with God, and names this as
        the third virtue. Compassion is understood as a        human need (1 Cor 1:9, Jon 14:23). Chris�ans
        mo�va�on of a person to feel the extent of an-         believe the goal of this union is fellowship with
        other’s emo�ons, accompanied by the desire             God that provides meaning, personal forma�-
        to help (Fulton, 2018; Roberts, 2017). This vir-       on, and redemp�on (Anstey, 2017). In part, this
        tue increases well-being by benefi�ng rela�-           forma�on results from a desire to follow the
        onships, reducing anxiety, regula�ng emo�ons,          God who has rela�onship with his people: “Put
        and increasing posi�ve experiences (Demorest,          on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and be-
        2019; Engen & Singer, 2015). Collec�vely these         loved, compassionate hearts, kindness, humili-
        three virtues appear to enhance well-being.            ty (Col 3:12)… And be thankful (Col 3:15).”






                                                           12
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17