Page 171 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 14
P. 171

(1983) suggests they are under no more stress     or factors contributing to attrition. Dodds and
             than others in the helping professions but may    Dodds  (1993;  1997)  implemented  a  modified
             be unaware or unwilling to report the level of    version  of  the  Holmes-Rahe  Social  Readju-
             stress and may under report it (Carter, 1999).    stment  Rating  Scale  (Holmes  &  Rahe,  1967)
             Consistent with studies on stress-related grow-   called a ‘stress-event scale’ to accommodate for
             th (Joseph & Linley, 2005; Tedeschi & Calhoun,    cross-cultural realities. Studies have also inclu-
             2004), missionaries may report positive chan-     ded other stress-related tools that directly or in-
             ges as a result of the stress even when the stress   directly measure stress, components of stress or
             is trauma-related (Irvine et al., 2006). In fact,   related factors such as burnout (Chester, 1983),
             missionaries appear to have a high degree of re-  trauma or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
             silience and may expect stress as part of their   (Bagley, 2003; Schaefer et al., 2007); hassles (Na-
             calling  (Bagley,  2003,  Schaefer  et  al.,  2007).   varra & James, 2002); hostility (Taylor & Ma-
             This resilience may in turn buffer the amount     loney, 1983); or well-being (Keckler, Moriarty
             of perceived stress (Alim, Feder, Graves, Wang,   & Blagen, 2008). Many studies focus on cross-
             Weaver, Westphal, & Charney, 2008), allowing      cultural adjustment stressors (Cerny Smith As-
             missionaries to continue being effective in their   sessment, 2018) while others address depressi-
             ministries  despite  the  difficulties.  Resiliency   on, anxiety or other psychological components
             factors may also be implicated in the underre-    (Pinkston, Chen & Richardson, 2015; Strand et
             porting  of  stress  in  this  population.  Notwith-  al., 2015). Many of these studies used multiple
             standing, all of these factors must be taken into   assessment  tools  concurrently.  In  addition  to
             consideration  in  evaluating  and  interpreting   these stress measures, several researchers have
             stress in missionary populations.                 used case studies (Gardner, 1987) self-reports
             In response to the high degree of stressors re-   and  mixed  methods  (Bikos,  et  al.,  2009)  that
             ported, mission agencies have made a concer-      yield rich data from which to examine the types
             ted effort to both assess the stress and provide   and severity of reported stressors.
             targeted  interventions  across  the  life  span  of   Despite the number of stress measures and stu-
             the missionary. This care referred to as member   dies evaluating missionary stress to date no re-
             care, which is now a global effort, is described   search could be located where a measurement
             by O’Donnell and Lewis -O’Donnell (2016) as       tool specific for missionary stressors had been
             an  interdisciplinary,  international,  and  multi-  tested  and  statistically  compared  to  existing
             sectoral  field  that  focuses  on  supporting  the   measures.  One  purpose  of  the  present  study
             diversity of mission/aid personnel and sending    was  to  test  a  newly  designed  quantitative  in-
             groups.  This  care  involves  the  provision  and   strument, the CHOPS Stress Inventory, develo-
             development  of  quality  resources  to  promote   ped to assess missionary stress and compare it
             wellbeing,  resiliency,  and  effectiveness.  It  in-  to the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS, Co-
             cludes  pre-field  training,  field  coaching,  per-  hen, Karmarck, & Mermelstein, 1983), that has
             sonnel departments, pastoral counselors, crisis   established psychometric qualities.
             support, and reentry preparation (O’Donnell &
             Lewis-O’Donnell, 2016).                           CHOPS Stress Inventory
                                                               O’Donnell and Lewis O’Donnell (2009, 2012)
             Stress Measurement Tools for Missionary Po-       have identified 10 common areas of stress cross-
             pulations                                         cultural  workers  encounter.  These  10  over-
             Numerous  studies  have  been  conducted  to      lapping  areas,  that  bear  research  support  are
             measure the types of stressors missionaries en-   represented  by  the  acronym  CHOPS,  include
             counter  with  a  variety  of  different  measures.   Cultural, described as getting one’s needs met in
             Gish (1983) developed a 65-item scale, which      unfamiliar  ways;  Crises,  potentially  traumatic
             was replicated in Carter’s study (1999). Bosch    events; Human, relationships; Historical, unre-
             (2014)  created  a  comprehensive  survey  tool   solved past areas of personal or social struggles;
             with  over  one  hundred  multiple  categories  of   Occupational, related to job specific challenges
             stress,  areas  of  need,  member  care  concerns   and stressors; Organizational, governance and


                                                           169
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176