Page 174 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 8
P. 174

Forum



             fails in its quest to describe the complexity, dimensionality, emotionality
             and intimacy associated with a human person. My heart reacts; but I am
             left speechless gazing at Vollmer’s drawings that defy simplistic summa-
             tion.

             Persons in Theodrama
             Christianity gives deep and earnest consideration to the human person
             for a very good reason. God’s story depicts persons as central to what the
             Creator is doing in his world. According to theologian Kevin Vanhoozer,
             the good news is theodramatic: it is God’s doing in speech and action.
             In the beginning, God places human persons in his grand and ongoing
             production as dialogue partners and performers who reflect (image) his
             very nature.  This theodramatic surround contributes a useful theologi-
                        1
             cal context to the previously mentioned aspects of human persons.


             Now the stage is set for this succinct response to the posed query. A per-
             son is a living soul with a distinctive voice to act out one’s part as a com-
             munitive agent in covenantal relations. Soul (OT nephesh/NT psyche) is
             a broad biblical term that in this context captures the sense of a person’s
             total being with visible and invisible characteristics. Our destiny is to
             be an expressive contributor to the fulfillment of cosmic history. Per-
             sons exhibit a “personal identity that is first and foremost a matter of our
             answerable agency” to the Lord of the universe.  Persons speak and act
                                                           2
             in ways that portray our characteristic response to the word and call of
             God.

             The biblical text uses imago Dei to convey the dynamic, pulsating forces
             that give humankind its exceptional urgency to be in face-to-face relati-
             onships and conversation. The metaphor of ‘image’ suggests that a per-
             son mirrors God’s nature as a corporeal icon. Our lifetime occupation as
             a person is to be active, deliberate and intentional to reflect our loving
             Creator and Lord. Image bearers crave proximity, recognition and com-
             munication with the One who is being represented. Humans echo divine
             speech as rational and relational urges burst from within to bond with
             others. Speech is the divine gift that equips human beings for communi-
             on, that is, enjoyable and rewarding dialogue with the Triune God and
             one another. 3




             1 Kevin J. Vanhoozer, The Drama of doctrine: A canonical-linguistic approach to Chris-
             tian theology. (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2005). For a brief review of
             theodrama with implications for Christian psychology, see Kevin J. Vanhoozer’s “For-
             ming the performers: How Christians can use canon sense to bring us to our (Thoedra-
             matic) senses in Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Christian Psychology,
             4  (1),  5-16.  [http://www.christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/Edification-
             4.1.pdf]
             2 Kevin J. Vanhoozer, Faith-Speaking Understanding: Performing the drama of doctri-
             ne. (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Know Press, 2014, p. 117).
             3 Stephen P. Greggo, “Theodramatic anthropology and the ‘significant’ self: Implica-
             tions for therapeutic relating.” Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Evan-
             gelical Theological Society (ETS), San Diego, CA, November 20, 2014. Submitted for
             publication.

                                                           173
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179