Page 180 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 180

The Work and Thinking of David Benner



             Mike Sheldon (Great Britain)
             Comment to                                             Mike Sheldon
                                                                    (Great  Britain)
             David G. Benner`s                                      is  an  ex-Gene-

             “Understanding our                                     ral  Practitio-
                                                                    ner. For several
             Humanity: in Soulful                                   years,  he  and
                                                                    his family wor-
             Spirituality, 2011 pp                                  ked in the mis-

             27-37”.                                                sion  field  and
                                                                    in
                                                                         Christian
                                                                    counseling.
             Introductory comments by Mike Sheldon                  Much of his life he has been spent in the
                These extracts from the book by Benner at-          academic world, teaching medical stu-
                tempt to answer one of the fundamental que-         dents about the art and science of Gene-
                stions which most of us ask at some point           ral Practice. He is now working mainly
                -“What makes me a human being?”
                The first obvious answer is that I am a physi-      in developing a Christian whole-person
                cal creature with a well developed mind. Ben-       approach to health care.
                ner starts by telling the story of Henri Nouwen                           www.wphtrust.com
                who was a gifted professor at several univer-
                sities, but later went to live with developmen-  their otherness too uncomfortable for us.
                tally disabled people at the L’Arche communi-  Or think of the way in which we so easily slip
                ty. He noted that most anthropologists would
                list the aspects of humanity as self-awareness,   into a kind of oblivion and live like sub-human
                speech, conscience, symbolic cognition, ima-   automatons – devoid of awareness and failing
                gination and a contemplation of our origins,   to fully exercise our fundamental human capa-
                but all of these were the products of the mind,   city for choice and action.
                and living with mentally disabled people had
                forced him to change his view to understand    Being fully alive, fully awake and fully human
                that the heart was the central part of a hu-   are far from normal or automatic occurrences.
                man and not the mind.                          But before we examine more closely why this is
                                                               and what we can do about it we should first con-
             “As a human, I am unable to know life as a rock,   sider the more basic question of what it means
             or as a flower, a bird or a god. I can, however,   to be human. Our answer to this will lay the
             know life as a human being. Being human is the    foundation for our discussion of what it means
             only way I can truly engage with life. It is, there-  to live in a manner that is both deeply spiritual
             fore, profoundly important if I want to be fully   and deeply human.
             alive.

             But you may wonder if I am making too much        What Makes Us Human?
             of  something  we  can  safely  take  for  granted.   Shortly before his death, Henri Nouwen was in-
             Perhaps, you might suggest, being human is na-    vited to deliver a special lecture at a university
             tural – the default option for beings who are ca-  where I was teaching. His years as a professor
             pable of being nothing else. However, while the-  at Notre Dame, Yale and Harvard universities
             re is truth in the fact that we are not capable of   made his scholarly credentials impeccable. Ho-
             being anything other than human, we are alar-     wever, his life since leaving the academy sugge-
             mingly capable of being less than fully human.    sted that this might be no ordinary academic
             Witness the atrocities we have perpetrated on     lecture. He had spent those years in Toronto in
             others whose humanity we have denied because      the L’Arche community of Daybreak – a com-
             they held beliefs that were different from ours –   munity  made  up  of  developmentally  disabled
             or because their skins were darker than ours, or   persons and a few helpers. He came onto the

                                                           179
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185