Page 177 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 177

The Work and Thinking of David Benner



                mon framework is constantly becoming more      ons of how to balance work and personal life?
                amorphous and crumbly.                         Where do people go who wish to explore their
                The role of the pastor in the counselling dia-  response to issues of injustice in their commu-
                logue is therefore generally moving towards    nities? The available contexts for shared inquiry
                that  of  the  ethically  responsible  Christian   into the moral issues of life are quite limited. At
                counsellor, while the latter is moving towards
                the role of the psychotherapist. All are facing   one time, the church played this role for the ma-
                the challenge of accepting that ethical reflec-  jority of the members of Western society. But
                tion is an important part of accompanying      unfortunately, its role has been seriously limi-
                the counsel-seeker, without it however being   ted by virtue of the marginalized place which it
                clear from the beginning from which source     now occupies in secularized society.
                the standards and orientation are to be taken.    Psychotherapists and counsellors who are wil-
                                                               ling  to  engage  around  these  moral  questions
             But what of those who do not work out of such     have been a resource for some people but, as
             a context and who do not offer a moral frame-     noted earlier, the majority of mental health pro-
             work for their care? An absence of such a frame-  fessionals have been seduced by the erroneous
             work can easily be construed as suggesting that   view  that  psychological  problems  are  unrela-
             moral considerations are not important. Such a    ted to morality and that moral considerations
             moral vacuum ultimately leads to a disintegra-    are, therefore, inappropriate to the therapeutic
             tion of the value framework of the individual     context.  For  most  people,  the  most  available
             and of society. It also contributes to moral con-  context for moral reflection is their friendships.
             fusion. Unfortunately, it is not just psychothe-  In fact, probably the majority of soul care that
             rapists who have fallen into the trap of thinking   is provided is that which is offered by friends
             that an absence of judgementalism requires an     to friends without any idea that what they are
             absence of moral reflection and inquiry. Under    doing is offering cura animarum. But, unfortu-
             the influence of therapeutic psychology, pasto-   nately, friendships often operate with the same
             ral counsellors have too often succumbed to the   understanding  of  privatized  morality.  Conse-
             same folly.                                       quently, friends often accept arbitrary limits on
                                                               conversation  that  make  moral  discourse  and
             An absence of a moral framework for soul care     ethical reflection awkward.
             also suggests that morality is a private and per-
             sonal matter, a position which when taken to         Wolfram Soldan: In its final part of the sec-
             the  extreme  suggests  that  each  person  is  ul-  tion on „pastoral conversation“, Benner goes
             timately  only  accountable  to  him  or  her  self.   into the important phenomenon of the priva-
             The privatization of morality has been a con-        tisation of morality/ethics and indicates that,
             sequence of the secularization of the West and       for precisely this reason, the raising of ethi-
                                                                  cal questions during counselling is still most
             the marginalization of the church. Most people       easily managed within friendly relationships
             acknowledge  that  moral  decisions  have  to  be    (and, I would add, also within a family con-
             made in life but seem to operate with the as-        text). For us Christians, this leads to a dilem-
             sumption that because these decisions have to        ma: we usually still believe in the validity of
             be made personally and individually, there is no     certain general ethical norms. If, however,
             significant role for shared inquiry on the matter.   we bring these directly (judgementally) into
             This is most unfortunate; morality is much too       a conversation, this can be very easily expe-
             complicated to be left to any of us alone. We de-    rienced by the vis-à-vis as an overstepping of
             sperately need relationships where we can enga-      boundaries into his private sphere and more
                                                                  or less openly rejected. Since in most cases a
             ge in careful reflection on the moral dimension      common ethical framework of this kind has
             of our life.                                         not been adequately marked out in advance,
             But  where  does  one  find  such  relationships?    the accusation of overstepping of boundaries
             Where can people turn to reflect on the ethical      has a justification when this arises in conver-
             and moral issues of their business and personal      sation. On the other hand, I am deeply con-
             lives? To whom can a person talk about questi-       vinced that most people have a longing not
                                                                  to be left alone with their ethical questions.
                                                           176
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182