Page 171 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 171

The Work and Thinking of David Benner



             sent  are  incomplete.  Loewald  (I960)  has  fo-  Perhaps it also represents one of the basic cura-
             cused on the therapeutic effect of the patient in-  tive factors in psychotherapy. Obviously it is not
             ternalizing the positive interaction of the thera-  the only one and taken alone it de-emphasizes
             py situation. This is reminiscent of Alexander‘s   the role and responsibility of the patient. It also
             (1948)  concept  of  the  “corrective  emotional   is not the only way in which the therapist relates
             experience.“ Bion (1968) and Winnicott (1965)     to the patient; thus, if this mode could be view-
             have both emphasized the integrating function     ed  as  corresponding  to  Christ‘s  priestly  role,
             which occurs within the patient when the the      other aspects of the therapist’s modes of rela-
             rapist emotionally and cognitively absorbs the    ting could be tied correspondingly to Christ‘s
             patient‘s inner chaos. They view this as relieving   prophetic  and  pastoral  roles  (Carlson,  1976).
             pressure on and in the patient, thus allowing a   However,  behind  these  various  roles  lies  the
             new degree of integration of personality.         relationship of the patient and therapist which
                                                               is basic to all else that is done. Involvement by
             Saretsky  (1981)  places  more  emphasis  on  the   the therapist which allows for absorption of suf-
             healing  of  splits  in  the  internal  self-represen-  fering and sharing of strength may well be the
             tations (corresponding to the different ways of   essence of this relationship.
             experiencing self). This is made possible by the
             projections  put  onto  the  therapist  being  gra-  Obviously it is possible for psychotherapists to
             dually re-owned and reabsorbed. Saretsky sees     avoid  this  sort  of  incarnational  involvement.
             this as the „natural outgrowth of the rich tape-  Those who fear such engagement often hide be-
             stry of healthy interchange“ (p. 93) between the   hind professionalism and technical rules. Both
             therapist and the patient and not primarily as a   of these have an important role in disciplining
             result of correct technical interventions.        our involvement to ensure that it is not primari-
                                                               ly meeting our needs but rather those of our pa-
             But  perhaps  it  is  more  parsimonious  to  view   tients. Professionalism also serves to maintain
             the curative factor in this basic process as love.   the necessary degree of separateness. However,
             Love involves giving of oneself to another, ma-   Rogers  (1961)  was  probably  correct  when  he
             king  oneself  available  to  bear  someone  else‘s   argued  that  professionalism  in  psychotherapy
             burdens and to share in their struggles. This is   has done more to protect therapists from their
             not „sloppy sentimentalism“ but rather tough,     fears of involvement than it has done to aid the-
             disciplined, and personally costly love. Its mode   rapeutic practice (p. 52).
             of communication is involvement. Its effect is
             healing.                                          Implications
                                                               The  Apostle  Paul  calls  all  Christians  to  the
             Such love can be communicated in a great many     challenge of bearing each other’s burdens. This
             different ways. This is precisely why it may be   is what Christ did and continues to do for hu-
             seen to be present in each of the approaches to   mankind, and it is this which we do in psycho-
             therapy. Well-conducted behavior therapy, ge-     therapy. But who is capable of bearing not only
             stalt  therapy,  existential  therapy,  and  psycho-  one‘s  own  burdens  but  also  those  of  others?
             analysis  all  involve  the  therapist  entering  the   What  enables  the  therapist  to  share  personal
             patient‘s world and becoming available to the     health and absorb the illness and suffering of
             patient.  In  one  way  or  another  all  these  (and   another without personal hazard? The answer
             other) modalities then encourage the patient to   is  that  therapists  must  have  their  own  health
             put inner confusion and chaos onto the thera-     continuously ensured by ongoing relationships
             pist who then attempts to render it less chaotic   where their needs are met and burdens shared.
             and frightening, more intelligible and benign.    It is important to emphasize that the sharing of
             This  assumption  and  transformation  of  the    strength and health does deplete the therapist‘s
             patient‘s inner world constitutes the incarnatio-  resources and that they must, therefore, lie con-
             nal element of psychotherapy.                     tinuously  renewed.  In  Luke  8:45-46,  Jesus  re-
                                                               ported an experience quite similar, even if not


                                                           170
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176