Page 5 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 23
P. 5

Regarding Finale 2.0:


        In German, reaching the finale can apply equally to     finds other words, other pictures, other sounds...
        the climax of a concert or the last round of the        for this reality. If we “listen” to these pictures, we
        World Cup. By defini�on, something has to precede       will discover new means of access to the life of Je-
        the finale, whether this be years of prac�ce and        sus. But “listening” also means taking �me, consi-
        training, of being repeatedly put to the test, some     dering and reconsidering at leisure, observing in
        moments of glory along the way… And even then,          oneself the resul�ng feelings, thoughts… In Hennry
        there is no certainty about the final result.           Wirth’s words, “…The objects, drawings and pictu-
        A�er centuries of wai�ng for the Messiah, a�er          res force one into a new and different way of
        one-and-a-half to two years of Jesus‘ public minis-     seeing. The encounter with the cross and the res-
        try, a�er his suffering, death and resurrec�on, one     urrec�on, which has taken on everyday familiarity,
        can declare this finale to have reached its conclusi-   suddenly appears in a new light. If this succeeds, it
        on at Pentecost. God, the Holy Spirit, lives in and     will be a great joy to me!”
        amongst us.
        And now we can look forward in an�cipa�on of a
        new Finale 3.0.                                         And Finale 3.0?


                                                                “We know, however, that the whole crea�on now
        2.0?                                                    con�nues to groan under its condi�on, as if it were
                                                                in pains of childbirth. And even we, to whom God
        2.0, a currently fashionable term invented in inter-    has of course already given his Spirit, the first part
        net language, means that interac�on can and             of our future inheritance, even we con�nue to gro-
        should take place between users and technology or,      an inwardly, because the full comple�on of our
        analogously, between users and art.                     des�ny as God’s sons and daughters has not yet
        This is the case here with Finale 2.0: the language     come.”
        of this art differs from what know in everyday life.    Romans 8:22-23
        For the things experienced or imagined, the ar�st
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10