Page 26 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 20
P. 26

gest that humility appears to act as a master          la�onship with God through means such as
        virtue to both compassion and gra�tude, but to         prayer.
        significantly different degrees.
                                                               Limita�ons and Future Research
        Implica�ons for Clinical Educators, Clinicians         The sample displays significant homogeneity
        and Researchers                                        regarding gender, ethnicity, and culture, which
        Prac�cal implica�ons arise that require careful        may be a result of the sampling method. The
        ethical and cultural sensi�vity. First, given the      majority white, female, American sample may
        predicted influence of a rela�onship with God          limit generalizability. Cross-religious and cross-
        on well-being in Chris�ans, fostering clinical         cultural interpreta�on may be spurious due to
        growth in clinical spiritual competencies is cri�-     the deliberate emic orienta�on of the research
        cal (Cashwell & Wa�s, 2010). Clinicians require        project.
        skill to help the Chris�an spiritually inquiring
        client develop rela�onship with their God. If          Response bias poses a significant threat to ver-
        this occurred, it is plausible that character vir-     acity as data was anonymous self-report, and
        tue gains may promote social benefits that go          par�cipants could not be verified. Further, the
        beyond measures of well-being. Furthermore,            Chris�an popula�on is known to respond to
        this study provides knowledge for clinicians           surveys in a self-enhancing manner (Gebauer
        working with Chris�ans, helping them to                et al., 2017), hoping to portray their faith favor-
        discern norma�ve poten�al changes to well-             ably. Measurement and sta�s�cal error may
        being that may arise from a rela�onship with           also limit validity given the complexity of cha-
        God. For example, it can be noted that sa�sfac-        racter virtues and limited measures of well-
        �on does not appear to be the norma�ve pri-            being.
        mary product of well-being in Chris�ans from a
        rela�onship with God, and therefore such a             The current study warrants repe��on that
        goal may be misguided.                                 a�ends to sample diversity, specifically race,
                                                               gender, and culture, and u�lizes a true random
        For those training Chris�an clinicians, a focus        sample. Varia�ons of the current study should
        on trainee growth in humility may be warran-           seek to clarify the model presented in this stu-
        ted as it appears to contribute to well-being          dy, assess addi�onal character virtues, and
        and other virtues per�nent to the clinical pro-        measure or control for Chris�an self-enhance-
        fession. For example, focusing on humility may         ment.
        promote virtue growth that is cri�cal to awa-
        reness of others and ac�on on their behalf (La-        This study has offered insight into the role of
        velock et al., 2017). Increasing evidence links        character virtue in media�ng between a Chris-
        humility to character virtues and experiences          �an rela�onship with God and well-being. The
        that are likely to mi�gate compassion-fa�gue           study findings provide prac�cal u�lity to clinical
        or burnout, and therefore develop personal sa-         educators, clinicians, and researchers. Finally,
        �sfac�on in Chris�an popula�ons.                       the authors report no compe�ng interest in the
                                                               produc�on of this research.
        The cost of compassion must not be forgo�en
        for Chris�ans, especially as they may see it as
        taking up one's cross. It would be a mistake to
        allow such moral convic�ons and desires to li-
        mit the care necessary to help Chris�an clini-
        cians avoid burnout or compassion fa�gue (Fre-
        derick et al., 2018). To help with this concern,
        Frederick et al. (2018) recommends spiritual re-
        vitaliza�on that depends on an empowering re-






                                                           26
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31