Page 154 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 14
P. 154

not occurred or had been forgotten. In his case   References
             he needed to feel the pain of the event, acknow-  Enright, R. & Fitzgibbons, R. (2000) Helping Clients For-
             ledge the layers of pain and anger caused by the   give. . American Psychologist Association, Washington.
             offence  (shame,  guilt,  obsessive  thoughts,  life   Enright,  R.  (2001)  Forgiveness  is  a  Choice.  American
                                                               Psychologist Association, Washington.
             changes, and changes in outlook) that had re-     McNeel, J. (2010) Understanding the Power of Injuncti-
             sulted from the abuse.                            ve Messages and How They are Resolved in Redecision
                                                               Therapy. Transactional Analysis Journal (40, 2):159-169.
             •  His freely chosen Decision Phase required      McNeel, J. (2016) The Heart of Redecision Therapy: Re-
                him  to  understand  of  the  true  nature  of   solving Injunctive Messages. In R.G.Erskine (Ed.) Tran-
                                                               sactional Analysis in Contemporary Psychotherapy. Kar-
                forgiveness and to make a commitment to        nac, London.
                forgive. This did not mean forgetting what     Sutton, P.M. (uploaded 2014) The Enright Process Model
                had happened or saying that it was OK, but     of  Psychological  Forgiveness.  http://couragerc.org/wp-
                it was an active decision to begin a process   content/uploads/Enright_Process_ Forgiveness_1.pdf
                of freeing himself of his liminal “prison of
                unforgiveness”.
             •  The Work Phase required him to work on
                trying to understand the offender, himself
                and the nature of the relationship between
                them. This required a reframing the stories
                about the event so that he could see the of-
                fender in a new light. At the same time as
                seeing the abuse for what it was and reali-
                zing that he was not to blame, he came to
                a place where he was able to having empa-
                thy  for  the  offender.  Enright  (2000)  poin-
                ted out that thinking differently about the
                offender precedes feeling more positive and
                becoming  more  empathic  and  compassio-
                nate. This process of beneficence cannot be
                rushed.
             •  The Deepening Phase. In Mr van der Weele’s
                case, he was able to use his experience po-
                sitively in the final Deepening Phase when
                he realized that there was meaning in suf-
                fering. He felt more connected with others
                and gained a renewed purpose in life. Freed
                from the emotional prison of unforgiveness,
                bitterness, resentment and anger, his ability
                to forgive was deepened to the point that he
                was able to have empathic regard in helping
                another abuser through his ministry of bles-
                sing others. The ministry of PowerfulPeace
                is  based  on  blessing  others  that  brings  to
                mind the powerful words of Christ:
             •  Bless them that curse you, and pray for them
                which despitefully use you. (Matthew 5:43-
                44; Luke 6:28 KJV)
             •  This is a challenge to us all.





                                                           152
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159