Page 26 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 10
P. 26

moral  awareness  in  light  of  personal  guilt.  In   ven to the people of Israel),” nonetheless, “by
             Psalm 32, the Psalmist describes the state of his   nature (physis) do what the law requires they
             soul before he confessed his sin: “my bones wa-   are a law to themselves, even though they do
             sted away” (v. 3); and “my strength was dried up   not have the law. They show that the work of
             as by the heat of summer” (v. 4). In Psalm 51,    the  law  is  written  on  their  hearts  (kardiais),
             the Psalmist acknowledges that his transgressi-   while their conscience (suneidēseōs) also bears
             ons and sin are “ever before me” (v. 3), and that   witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse
             he needs to be washed and cleansed from his       or even excuse them on that day when, accor-
             sin in order to hear joy and gladness, so that    ding  to  my  gospel,  God  judges  the  secrets  of
             “the bones that you have broken” can “rejoice”    men by Christ Jesus” (Ro 2:14-16; ESV). Paul
             (2,  7-8;  ESV).  Such  descriptions  would  seem   teaches here that mature human beings in every
             indicate the presence and activity of a consci-   culture possess some knowledge of God’s ethi-
             ence—and the decidedly embodied nature of its     cospiritual design plan or guidelines for human
             experience—even if the word is not yet availab-   life—we might say, written by the hand of God
             le to label it, signified by physical and emotional   just as surely as God had written the 10 com-
             distress  in  response  to  guilt  and  physical  and   mandments on tablets of stone. This is eviden-
             emotional wellbeing when one is cleansed and      ced (sūmmarturousēs; Gk., “to bear witness”) by
             washed from that guilt.                           the inner ethical conflict all humans experience
             One  of  the  clearest  OT  allusion  made  to  the   periodically,  manifested  in  self-recrimination
             conscience is found in 1 Samuel, when Abigail     or a defensive excuse-making, that will come to
             is asking David to accept her gifts of food in an   light in the final judgment. Such teaching has
             attempt to appease David’s anger after her hus-   led Christian thinkers to posit the existence of a
             band had rejected David’s plea for food for his   “natural law,” impressed deeply into and acces-
             men.  Abigail  suggests  that  because  of  David’s   sible to all humans independently of God’s spe-
             righteous  cause,  he  should  have  no  cause  of   cial revelation to human beings given through
             grief or a troubled heart (lēb, Heb.) about doing   theophany (e.g., his judgment upon the Israe-
             wrong,  for  example,  “having  shed  blood  wit-  lites on account of the golden calf; Ex 32:35),
             hout cause and my lord having avenged him-        prophetic utterance, or Scripture.
             self” (1Sa 25:31; New American Standard), sin-    We should also note that on a couple of occa-
             ce he has done nothing wrong.                     sions the Apostle Paul referred to his readers’
             By the time the NT was written, however, the      consciences  that  formed  positive  moral  judg-
             Greek  word  syneidēsis  had  become  available,   ments  about  Paul’s  integrity  (2Co  4:2;  5:11).
             and so some of the NT authors made reference      This suggests that the conscience is not just a
             to the conscience. Perhaps the most common        perceptual module of moral self-evaluation, but
             use was to refer to it when it was functioning as   also has a social dimension.
             a mark of wellbeing, calling it “good (Acts 23:1;   To summarize and develop the foregoing, the
             1Ti 1:5; 1:19; 1Pt 3:16, 21), “clear” (Acts 24:16;   term “conscience” is a label that refers to a fa-
             1Ti  3:9;  2Ti  1:3;  Heb  13:18),  or  “clean”  (Heb   culty or module, distinct to humans, dedicated
             10:22). In such a state, the conscience positive-  to the perception of moral reality, that includes
             ly  validates  one’s  moral  integrity  before  God,   cognitive,  affective,  volitional,  and  relational
             cognitively and affectively (more on this in the   components; and it appears to have a positive
             new covenant, below). Put negatively, the cons-   and  a  negative  aspect.  Assuming  the  proper
             cience in such a state does not bear witness of   function of the conscience, the positive activity
             one’s guilt, either because one has not recently   of the conscience is demonstrated in the pos-
             done anything blameworthy or because it has       session of a valid perception of one’s goodness,
             been  cleansed  by  God’s  forgiveness  in  Christ   cleanness,  integrity,  and  authenticity,  valid  in
             (Heb 10:22; 1Jn 1:9).                             that it corresponds to God’s evaluation of one’s
             The Apostle Paul gave us the fullest description   action  and  being,  and  this  perceptual  ability
             of the conscience in the Bible. “When Gentiles,   can  be  directed  towards  others.  The.negative
             who do not have the (Mosaic) law (that was gi-    activity  of  the  conscience  is  evidenced  in  the

                                                           24
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31