Page 57 - EMCAPP-Journal No. 7
P. 57

Foundational Discussions in Christian Psychology



             to have attributed his person-centered therapy    problems),  and  choose  behavioral  patterns  in
             in reaction to “dark Calvinism” taught to him     keeping with stated commitments. While this
             in childhood.                                     model  represents  a  third  generation  of  beha-
             Indeed it is true that we can trace human suffe-  vioral therapy, it too prioritizes the voice and
             ring back to original sin. Yet, counseling models   insights of the client.
             focusing on sin as the cause of human problems
             too easily morph into searching for willful sin   In addition, narrative exposure therapies such
             as the cause of particular problems. You are de-  as Narrative Exposure Therapy and Cognitive
             pressed? It is because you sinned. You are an-    Processing Therapy also prioritize the voice and
             xious? It is because you sinned or lack faith. In   story of victims of psychosocial trauma. While
             my psychopathology course I ask my students to    new perspectives are sought, they develop not
             consider what it means to be an image-bearer of   so much from the expert therapist who corrects
             God. Typically, student responses include cha-    perspective  but  more  from  a  mutual  bearing
             racteristics such as reason, relationality, agency,   witness to the story. Such witness often presents
             self-less love, and the like. I then split the class   opportunity  to  highlight  hidden  narratives,
             in half to ask one group to develop questions     consider new perspectives borne out of trauma
             they might ask a first-time client if starting from   (posttraumatic growth), and question distorted
             imago dei as the ultimate reality. The other half   perspectives gained during trauma.
             is charged to consider questions they might ask
             if starting from the Fall as ultimate reality. This   These  narratival  and  relationship-oriented
             little project rarely fails to convince students that   counseling methods ought to be foundational
             starting points shape entire counseling relation-  for  every  Christian  counselor.  Therapy  is  far
             ships.  I  conclude  by  asking  students  whether   less a “telling” than it is a “being with” ministry.
             they tend towards being a creation counselor or   We see this illustrated by Jesus as he interacts
             a Fall counselor. Most students conclude that it   with the man by the pool of Bethesda (John 5)
             is tempting to look only at problems rather than   or the woman at the well (John 4). We see relati-
             client capacities and inherent value. But when    onship and dialog take precedence over presen-
             they  consider  times  in  their  lives  when  they   tation of a verdict; we see gentle questions re-
             have been themselves most helped, most con-       garding their narratives prioritizing respect for
             clude that being respected, listened to, valida-  the “sinner’s” voice. Essential to the Christian
             ted (vs. blamed and exhorted) enabled them to     life is the construction of a narrative about the
             work through problems and take an active role     identify of believers are in this world. Christian
             in their own growth.                              counselors  needn’t  worry  that  such  construc-
                                                               ting  of  narratives  are  done  without  regard  to
             Narrative Therapies and the Construction of       truth. Those interested in narrative work done
             Meaning                                           from a distinctly evangelical frame may wish to
             The essay only briefly speaks of narrative thera-  explore Kevin Vanhoozer’s 2010 essay on theo-
             py as an alternative to counseling starting from   drama (narrative) shaped by therapists as “ac-
             original sin. Berg provides little explanation of   ting” or script coaches.
             this model nor does he connect it to the emer-    I thank Sam berg for the essay on addressing
             ging therapies today that utilize narrative con-  clients  from  a  positive  co-constructional  per-
             struction as central to the change process. Berg   spective  and  urge  that  all  counselors  re-con-
             cites Epston and White’s work and their focus     sider  starting  assumptions  that  unnecessarily
             on processes such as externalization of the pro-  focus on the negative in the lives of those they
             blem and support for the client to explore and    help.
             recreate her own story, agency, and identity.
             Today, therapies like Acceptance and Commit-      Vanhoozer,  K.J.  (2010).  Forming  the  performers:  How
             ment Therapy (ACT) are being used to help cli-    Christians can use canon sense to bring us to our (theo-
             ents explore and examine explicit and implicit    dramatic)  senses.  Edification,  4:1,  5-17.  http://www.
                                                               christianpsych.org/wp_scp/wp-content/uploads/Edifica-
             values, accept realities (much like externalizing   tion-4.1.pdf

                                                           56
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62